▲ 525 ▼ Raspberry Pi is intentionally blocking RAM capacity upgrades (www.notebookcheck.net) submitted 1 week ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (3 children) But it's a foundation, with a charitable goal.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children) And yet they had an IPO 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) So they are a company but also a foundation. How? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* Clever accounting, one entity invoices the other and whatnot. One entity could be the reseller for the goods the other one is producing for example. Similar arrangements (no need for a foundation, just invoicing between your own entities) like that are often done e.g to pay your taxes in a lower rate jurisdiction than where you earn your money. You could set up a company that sells stuff and another company to hold the IP and then pay royalties. Etc. ClosedAI is looking to do something similar, go from non-profit to for-profit. Personally I'm of the opinion that such a thing should warrant investigations and possibly indictments for fraud. Because it IS fraud, or at least false advertising. If I buy a Raspberry Pi, knowing that it's a foundation with a good cause, and the next day they announce they're starting a for-profit company to handle everything, that's very much false advertising, as the foundation model was be one of the factors in choosing which product to buy. If that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children) And yet they had an IPO 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) So they are a company but also a foundation. How? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* Clever accounting, one entity invoices the other and whatnot. One entity could be the reseller for the goods the other one is producing for example. Similar arrangements (no need for a foundation, just invoicing between your own entities) like that are often done e.g to pay your taxes in a lower rate jurisdiction than where you earn your money. You could set up a company that sells stuff and another company to hold the IP and then pay royalties. Etc. ClosedAI is looking to do something similar, go from non-profit to for-profit. Personally I'm of the opinion that such a thing should warrant investigations and possibly indictments for fraud. Because it IS fraud, or at least false advertising. If I buy a Raspberry Pi, knowing that it's a foundation with a good cause, and the next day they announce they're starting a for-profit company to handle everything, that's very much false advertising, as the foundation model was be one of the factors in choosing which product to buy. If that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) So they are a company but also a foundation. How? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* Clever accounting, one entity invoices the other and whatnot. One entity could be the reseller for the goods the other one is producing for example. Similar arrangements (no need for a foundation, just invoicing between your own entities) like that are often done e.g to pay your taxes in a lower rate jurisdiction than where you earn your money. You could set up a company that sells stuff and another company to hold the IP and then pay royalties. Etc. ClosedAI is looking to do something similar, go from non-profit to for-profit. Personally I'm of the opinion that such a thing should warrant investigations and possibly indictments for fraud. Because it IS fraud, or at least false advertising. If I buy a Raspberry Pi, knowing that it's a foundation with a good cause, and the next day they announce they're starting a for-profit company to handle everything, that's very much false advertising, as the foundation model was be one of the factors in choosing which product to buy. If that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* Clever accounting, one entity invoices the other and whatnot. One entity could be the reseller for the goods the other one is producing for example. Similar arrangements (no need for a foundation, just invoicing between your own entities) like that are often done e.g to pay your taxes in a lower rate jurisdiction than where you earn your money. You could set up a company that sells stuff and another company to hold the IP and then pay royalties. Etc. ClosedAI is looking to do something similar, go from non-profit to for-profit. Personally I'm of the opinion that such a thing should warrant investigations and possibly indictments for fraud. Because it IS fraud, or at least false advertising. If I buy a Raspberry Pi, knowing that it's a foundation with a good cause, and the next day they announce they're starting a for-profit company to handle everything, that's very much false advertising, as the foundation model was be one of the factors in choosing which product to buy. If that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent