you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 1 week ago (13 children)

"After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected."

Wow.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    God forbid you talk about social topics on SOCIAL media…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    not that i'm a meta fan, I fucking hate that company, but this swings both ways. Imagine your local coffee shop is boosting posts about traditional marriage and pro-life themes. They get blocked as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    I just don't go to that coffee shop. Problem solved. They can say whatever they want. If I don't support it I don't go. I don't see how the coffee shop argument hold up. And if enough people hold the same views they close.

    Meta however is too big to fail. Which gives them a free pass to pass their cancerous views onto society while knowing no matter how much the general public hates them and their shitty views they will continue to use the platform because their friends and family still use it. Enshittification. If my coffee shop enshittifies I tell them to pound sand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    They do pay "content creators" who have views on the opposite side of the political aisle and when caught paying far-right activists, they said:

    “Such speech may be offensive to many, but it is not Meta’s role to police offensiveness,” the company added.

    While PAYING to advertise a book with feminism as a theme is not OK. They're clearly pushing an agenda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment