Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,729 readers

4,576 active

501 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

What spelling, grammar or semantics rules have been lost in your lifetime? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Dagobah@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Language is always changing. At one point 'an apron' was 'a napron' while words like 'literally' are no longer literally literal. What are some language battles that have been lost in living memory and what are some others you predict will soon occur?

Edit: Non-english examples very welcome!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The OED actually includes the definition of literally as being what used to be the opposite of its definition nowadays, so I think that it does count as an auto-antonym (a word that means both itself, and the opposite of itself)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent