you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 days ago (7 children)

if it looks like a goat, and acts like a goat, it's a goat.

Logic like this is why people used to consider mammals like dolphins and beavers as fish. Stop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • Doplphins and beavers don't act or look like fish to me. Dolphins maybe I could understand if you were an ancient person who lived inland, but beavers?

    But I guess part of crowdsourcing is that you get some really stupid people on the project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children)

    Some communities and parishes in the St Louis , MO area still recognize a 17th century French Catholic decision that, as aquatic animals, Beaver fall inside the dispensation that "fish" is acceptable for consumption on Fridays. Soooo, no matter its appearance, it is kinda fish?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Who tf listens to Catholic's opinions on taxonomy? Especially 17th century ones?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago

    "fish" is perhaps a bad example to make your point with, given that that's a non-technical term that doesn't refer to any particular genetic branch of the animal kingdom - hence the podcast "no such thing as a fish". So I'd say that calling a mountain goat a goat is supported by the idea that many unrelated animals are called fish.

  • source
  • parent