you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Oh, I was gently warning you that you were unintentionally wrong. OP's link is about power, and your link is about energy, and you've somehow managed to completely misread it.

But if you're gonna dig in your heels, then sure. Continue being wrong. Being a dick about it won't make others take you seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    You literally wrote the wrong unit. What a loathsome fucking wretch you are. Stupid, antagonistic, smarmy. This place is more reddit every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You're thinking of OP (or the original article's title), the person you've been talking to here is someone else

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Either way, OP is correct. The linked article talks about power capacity, not energy produced. This jackass decided to come in and call another website a "Wikipedia source," misquote a completely different and irrelevant energy stat by 4 orders of magnitude, using a power unit, and bring some kind of attitude with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,”

    Think about this for literally five seconds you fucking moron.

    Does wikipedia link to itself as a source?

    What do you think the word 'source' means?

  • source
  • parent