you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 73 points 3 days ago (30 children)

Thirty-four time convicted felon AND a SERIAL CHILD RAPIST

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago* (16 children)

    And a murderer. In the Epstein files he literally participated in an infanticide

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (14 children)
  • [+] -15 points 3 days ago* (13 children)

    Clinton was a friend of Epstein, too.

    Why does he get a "child molester pass", friend?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    He certainly doesn't, but

    • He hasn't held office for 26 years.

    • He's not the individual currently covering up the files.

    • He's said he wants them released. Defensive strategy? Maybe.

    • To my knowledge, nobody has ever come forward to accuse Slick Willy of raping them as a minor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago

    Whataboutism

    What relevance does Clinton have to anything? There's a bunch of random people in the files too; somehow, that the president is a child murdering pedo, some are more relevant than others....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Because he is not currently ratfucking the entire planet. When the Clinton’s get voted back into power then you can come and talk to me about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Epstein and Clinton hung out a lot.

    When you pretend that's not the case, 70% (at least) of people know immediately that you are not to be taken seriously.

    (40% of voters are independents, they all know that Clinton and other Ds were in Epstein's circle, along with Trump and Rs... 30% of voters are republicans, and they know that Clinton and other Ds were with Epstein, along with Trump and Rs).

    You should be ashamed of yourself to put it all on Trump and ignore Clinton, just pretend that he's not there. Revolting.

    Trump-Clinton files. Say it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    literally no one cares if Bill Clinton gets in trouble. have at it champ, it's no excuse to leave Trump alone when he's actually the person running the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    That question reveals the extent to which MAGA is a cult of idiots. They expect people to be falling over themselves to defend Clinton because he's "one of us" and that's what they do. We don't care. Lock him up if he's guilty. Our ideas are not attached to any one person, so individuals can be held accountable for their actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Trump, on the other hand, is a THIRTY FOUR TIME CONVICTED FELON AND A SERIAL CHILD RAPIST

    WE KNOW.

    IT WENT TO TRIAL.

    EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED.

    BEFORE A JURY.

    COUNTER ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE WERE PRESENTED.

    THEY GAVE EVERYTHING THEY COULD.

    G U I L T Y

    THEY FOUND HIM G U I L T Y

    OF

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    TWENTY FIVE

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    THIRTY ONE

    THIRTY TWO

    THIRTY THREE

    THIRTY FOUR

    THIRTY FOUR FELONIES.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    No, you’re obsessed with Trump because you can’t square him. Aren’t the systems of civility and institutionalism supposed to stop that kind of guy? Total freak out, he’s mango Mussolini, he’s a Cheeto in the dang White House!!! In reality, he’s there because the business interests in this country like his meaningless word drivel spew which seems to make line go up for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    All you've admitted is that the GOP has abandoned loyalty to the Constitution and substituted it with loyalty to Dear Leader. All those institutions were supposed to be interested in preserving their own role in government, and instead they've abdicated their responsibilities and ceded their power to the fascist kid rapist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago (1 child)

    How can I get you to understand this is all within the framework of American capitalism and American “””democracy?””” There will still be elections in 4 years, and liberals will eat it up and maybe even fail to get a failson dipshit like Newsome elected. By that point the requisite decisions have already been made, without you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago

    If Newsom is nominated, and I very much hope he is not, it will be because he won a fair primary, just like every nominee before him, with maybe the exception of Harris, who was the de facto nominee because of the circumstances. (Biden really should have withdrawn in 2023.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    Florida allows felons to vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Nah. We voted to have civil rights restored after sentence was served, but the government did an end run around the people (as usual) and said, "you mean sentence served and fines paid, right?" Then immediately started imposing fines of hundreds of thousands of dollars, really unimaginable amounts, so that it was impossible to ever finish paying them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (4 children)

    Maybe in local elections, but I always thought the whole point of the "FElon"title is to say you've committed a FEderal level crime, and therefore have certain rights stripped, such as voting and owning a firearm (notably, two tools that basically only affect people who don't have huge normal power like political or financial).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    "Felon" just means they committed a felony. It doesn't need to be at the federal level to be a felony. It's just a more serious level of charge than misdemeanor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Hmmm, worth looking up...

    Per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony):

    A felony is traditionally considered a crime of high seriousness, whereas a misdemeanor is regarded as less serious.[1] The term "felony" originated from English common law (from the French medieval word "félonie") to describe an offense that resulted in the confiscation of a convicted person's land and goods, to which additional punishments, including capital punishment, could be added;[2] other crimes were called misdemeanors. Following conviction of a felony in a court of law, a person may be described as a felon or a convicted felon.

    In many common-law jurisdictions, such as England and Wales, Ireland, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, crimes are no longer classified as felonies or misdemeanors. Instead, crimes are classified by mode of trial as indictable offenses, triable by jury, and frequently requiring a grand jury indictment, which are usually more serious, and summary offenses, triable by summary procedure without a jury and are usually less serious.[3]

    In some civil law jurisdictions, such as Italy and Spain, the term delict is used to describe serious offenses, a category similar to common law felony. In other nations, such as Germany, France, Belgium, and Switzerland, more serious offenses are described as "crimes", while "misdemeanors" or "delicts" (or délits) are less serious. In still others, such as Brazil and Portugal, "crimes" and "delicts" are synonymous (more serious) and are opposed to contraventions (less serious).

    Surprisingly white/Europe centric, but still interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    "Felony" has nothing to do with "federal", completely different etymologymies and meanings. A felon could be a state felon or a federal felon or both, it just depends which statutes they're convicted of breaking. "Felony" is just a degree of criminality, higher than misdemeanor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    He raped more than children, equal opportunity rapist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    This comment gives "white lives matter"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    Pointing out a technically true but similar but different issue that waters down the original message - it absolutely does.

    I'm certain this wasn't their actual intent, nor did they mean anything remotely like malice, more just to, like they responded, make a joke.

    But my pointing it out I think is important, to correct our own problematic language, which heavily influences how we think and affect others. My correction was harsh, and could definitely have been clearer. But I do stand by the notion and the correction.

  • source
  • parent