you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

one other factor is dynamic range of the scene, where we can see some details in the moon with naked eye, but in the photo without heavy post processing it will basically look like white circle, if you also want to have any other details in the scene other than the moon

https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=dynamic+range+photography

there is also phenomenon called telephoto compression often used with the moon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephoto_compression

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Dynamic range might play a role indeed.

    I don't "Telephoto compression" really applies here and I'm pretty sure that photo comparison you included is edited

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    photo comparison you included is edited

    you mean the one with three moons? indeed it is, there are no three moons in the wild...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I meant that the size of the moon in these photos is edited and the actual effect would not look like that, so it's misleading

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment