But for every lustful post killed by a legal threat, another 10 take its place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 103 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This media has been disabled in response to a report by the copyright owner

Other Bluesky furry accounts have accused Kiwibank of censoring sexy sheep art that wasn’t even connected to Buck in any way, essentially making their work collateral damage in a war over a reputably fuckable farm animal from New Zealand.

The DMCA is out of control

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Since when does the DMCA apply in Aotearoa?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    The Spinoff has seen several of the takedown requests, which were issued under the American Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). They were sent out by Christopher Young, a partner at the prominent law firm MinterEllisonRuddWatts who specialises in intellectual property law. The notice viewed by The Spinoff accuses 10 accounts, including @jestermaxxing, of having “taken Kiwibank’s distinctive Buck image and used it to make highly sexualised and inappropriate copies which infringe the Kiwibank copyright”. X appears to have complied with the complaint.

    DMCA takedowns are valid regardless of what country they come from I think, and both Twitter and Bluesky are based in the US

  • source
  • parent