submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by to c/comics@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We have a word for flying in liquids instead of gasses, but I can't remember it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    But that's only a nominal distinction, and gets into circular arguments like "A is not in B because the definition of B excludes A." Physically, swimming and flying are basically the same thing. For the smallest insects, the air is viscous enough that their structures and motion for "flying" share more similarities with how aquatic organisms swim than how birds fly.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairyfly

    I think it has more to do with how human languages are necessarily human centric. WE can't fly through the air (not when those words were being developed) but we can swim through water. So our brains categorise them as different concepts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment