Welcome again to everybody. Make yourselves at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 day ago* (11 children)

If Flavio's count doesn't go beyond 50%, then it seems highly likely that a runoff election will happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    am i right in thinking that flavio is likely to win the runoff? it seems as though the majority of the third-party votes are for far-right candidates

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    It is difficult for me to make an educated guess because I don't have as much insight as a Brazilian comrade.

    Hopefully, someone with better insight might come along and give you their perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    my mistake. i thought i remembered you saying somewhere that you were brazilian, but i must have been thinking of someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    I am actually from Mexico. 😄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    in that case, can i ask about the zapatistas? specifically, have they been an effective anti-imperialist force or are they going to end up like rojava?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    From my personal point of view, they are similar to rojava without the US support(context -> https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6488415). They do make statements supporting Cuba but they sometimes invite USAID funded liberals that have voiced views against Nicaragua and Venezuela. Regardless of their views, they serve as a force that stops internal plunder within Chiapas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

    but surely the US support would have been the central defining factor? meaning, even if they are a bit libbed up, they aren't an extension of the empire in the way rojava is? that seems like what you're getting at with the last sentence; am i right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago* (2 children)

    No, they are not an extension of the US. Actually, they are in direct opposition to US backed companies(agrobusinesses) in the region that want to plunder the natural resources there.

    In Mexico, the ones that are actively supported by the US and serve as the "Freikorp" of capitalists are the narcos/drug traffickers. As evidence, you can see this quote from a lawyer of a union:

    The intervention of organized crime groups in the country's mining sector "has become a cancer promoted by foreign capital, especially by Canadian and American companies," said Óscar Alzaga Sánchez, lawyer for the National Mining Union, which is chaired by legislator Napoleón Gómez Urrutia.

    This is what I was trying to tell you by saying they stop internal plunder. This means that they are opposing those groups(promoted by national and US capitalists) to destroy the region.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments