you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 5 days ago (8 children)
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Dicks are irrelevant. If you can genuinely look at the picture in that article and call it "porn" you're even weirder than the fascist piece of shit it was sent to mock.

    It damn sure wouldn't meet any legal definition.

    For someone who started off their diatribe by accusing everyone else of lacking critical thinking skills, you damn sure have t bothered to address any of the counterpoints or analysis anyone else has brought up. It's almost like you lack critical thinking skills and are just reacting to vibes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -8 points 4 days ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    spreading rape apologia whether you know it or not.

    Kinda rich coming from someone whose definition of sexual assault is so broad (and thereby so cheapened) that it includes sending cartoon dicks to politicians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I wonder how this person would qualify me touching my junk at the urinal. Since it involves touching an exposed penis, I suppose they would classify urinal usage as "public masturbation" and "sexual harassment" if anyone else is in the bathroom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments