217
no one can understand AI (europe.pub)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52826581

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 5 days ago (6 children)

No no we still gotta worry about people in power allowing the worst possible use of technology at everyone's expense for personal gain..

So same old

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [+] -14 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    What specifically do you want the people in power to do?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    A very good start would be people not having that much power to begin with. Especially not if they’re not democratically elected representatives.

    But for the people in power we’re seemingly talking about (AI company leaders):

    • Not presenting AI as something mystical/mythical
    • Not turning AI into a product tailored to be addictive
    • Not framing AI as a tech only they can be trusted to keep and distribute (see also point 1)
    • Maybe developing the technology towards what gives most utility, not what earns them the most money (fat chance)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    I just want these AI companies to be held accountable for openly trying to hack everyone. It's ridiculous they're allowed to hide behind "AI did it, not us" as if what their product does isn't their responsibility.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago*

    Think of it as a game, the players are corpo, and gov.

    Corpo hacks planet, gov says, "Hm, that's pretty bad corpo, we could hold you accountable.. but.. that's pretty neat, maybe share a lil with us how you achieved this terrible incident (that we totally don't want to leverage against international peers) and we can forget this happened.."

    A game of incentives.

    If the gov comes down too hard, they could slow the development, the same development that they short-sightedly want to exploit in parallel with the accused.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 4 days ago*
    • Not presenting AI as something mystical/mythical

    this is hard, it’s pretty awesome. How would you want it presented? As a boring tool that does nothing important? Not understanding. The product sells itself to those who see value

    • Not turning AI into a product tailored to be addictive

    Is this something they’re doing?

    • Not framing AI as a tech only they can be trusted to keep and distribute (see also point 1)

    Agreed; open weight models are kicking their ass with this tho. I run local only.

    • Maybe developing the technology towards what gives most utility

    are we not doing that? Why do you need them for this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent