871
Meta Is Refusing to Remove AI-Generated Facebook Videos of Graphic Child Abuse, Including a Baby Roasting in an Oven. Meta is making it clear: it doesn't care about AI-generated child abuse videos. (futurism.com)
submitted 1 day ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
173 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 day ago (14 children)

It's in their rule that if it's too graphic then they might take it down. Emphasise on "might", it's very arbitrary, and they take down content for less.

Inb4 "it's AI generated it's okay" that mean AI generated child porn is okay as well.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    I would argue AI generated child porn is better than the alternative, perhaps if it was legal it would give people an option that causes no harm

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    And where would the genAI get its training data from?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Couldn't the ai make child porn by just combining the concepts of porn and children? Like there's no training data of basketball players who are pigeons because they're not pigeons, but the ais are still able to make basketball player pigeon hybrids that are cluttering tenor for some reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    I mean, it would help satiate the pervert(who just wanna look), but it will not make the actual rapist(who want the action, for the lack of better word) to stop, and CSAM is provided by the latter. I don't see why using genAI CSAM to satiate the former would solve much of the issue, the former will just watch adult porn if there's no child porn. On the other hand it's not like there's a lack of loli hentai.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    And the abundance of online pornography explains why people don't rape people any more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    That has been legal far longer than Gen AI has existed, we don’t know how much of an effect it has on crime stats but I am sure there less rape now than there has ever been

    If cutting 100% of crime is the only time doing something is worth it then no laws would exist

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    OK, how about another angle. If you make AI CSAM a thing, you've given basically anybody in possession of real CSAM an out. Also, presumably real CSAM is still illegal, so the difference between a pat on the back and serious prison time is whether some poor jury thinks the 8 year old rape victim in the video looks real enough.

    Get out of here with this shit. It's gross.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I guess that's a good argument about why it should be mandatory that all AI generated images should have some kind of watermarking to make them identifiable

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    generally a good idea, but not for this:

    CSAM distributors will quickly figure out how to add the watermark to real content; what then?

    then you've got an even bigger problem on your hands...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •