you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

Sounds like there's more I'd want to see clarified. What lead him to imply the state was directly working with an advertiser? If an ad was posted on the side of a building owned by a property company, then I'm not sure I see the government relation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment