you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 16 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I’d say about a 50 cent peice in thickness. The snake had been run over on the road before and I figure that’s gotta jeopardize the structural integrity.

As to why the snake it was halfway explained. The guy had run over the snake then the killer guy picked it up and tracked him down. Then strangled him with the snake. It was never really explained if the murder had a fondness for snakes or something and was mad it got run over? I feel like that’s what they were going for but it was not clear at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    Fresh roadkill would probably hold, but if the snake had been dead for more than a few days, it would have been a much different scene involving burst intestines

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments