86
Umm... (europe.pub)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/funny@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 4 days ago* (11 children)

A social media aggregation platform has no inherent right to exclusivity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

    The problem isn't the content itself, it's that they're an unlabeled bot that doesn't change anything from the reddit posts. It takes the post, word for word, and posts it here. They have made over 1400 posts in a month. They operate at least three accounts that all do the same exact thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (9 children)

    If they're an unlabeled bot that's a problem, but acting like it's a crime to cross post from reddit to the fediverse means nothing to me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

    They use LLMs to post, they leaked their prompt once a few weeks ago.

    It's not a crime to cross post from reddit, but it should be against the rules to use scripts and LLMs to post reddit content over 1200 times in a month on a single account. It's more than that if you include their other two accounts.

    As you see by their reply to you, anyone that points this out gets called a reddit "agent" or employee by the operator. They weren't smart enough to avoid doing so on their other two accounts, which shows they operate those other two as well. That is the problem I have: they put no effort into their posts, fill the threadiverse with an incredible amount of reddit slop through multiple accounts, and the vast majority of their "engagement" is calling users reddit agents. They get away with not having the bot label because they make comments seperately like the reply to you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Oh look, another self-appointed Threadiverse police officer deciding what content everyone else is allowed to enjoy.

    Nobody appointed you the gatekeeper of the Fediverse. If communities allow posting and people enjoy the content, who the fuck are you to decide otherwise?

    And I know exactly how your little game works. First, harass posters. Then pressure community moderators to ban them. When that fails, escalate to instance admins. Then pressure receiving instances. And if someone creates their own instance? Suddenly you're screaming for defederation.

    The goalposts never stop moving because your goal isn't a solution. It's eliminating people bringing content.

    You complain about low-effort content while spending your time obsessively policing people who actually contribute something.

    Block the accounts. Block the communities. Move the fuck on.

    But apparently that's not enough. You want to control what everyone else sees, too.

    And you wonder why people suspect you're acting in bad faith.

    btw it wont work -ill just create my own community and post there if I get banned.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago*

    This was written by an LLM, why would I read it? This is not how you write, look at the rest of your comments and your little addition at the bottom that is written in your normal style.

    So, this is just yet another LLM post from the reddit user.

    I wish you would post in your own community, because then people could just avoid them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    This sounds like a lot of baseless mud flinging with little to no hard evidence to back it up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    What evidence are you looking for? Look at their account and the post count. Look at their comment history. Do you want me to find where they leaked their LLM prompt? What about where they used an LLM to reply to me above?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Wow, you are insufferable and still haven't given any evidence. Have a nice day I guess. bye.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    Thread talking about this operators two other accounts:

    https://lemmy.world/comment/26006557

    Link to thread where they don't deny that sanitation is also their account and say "Ya welcome for the content": https://lemmy.world/comment/26212372

    Link to their post where they left the LLM prompt in:

    https://lemmy.today/post/60529524

    Full title: In Pulp Fiction (1994) these oranges are actually rock solid on the inside because in-universe the soft wet part inside of fruits does not exist according to the title. The title preserves the original title. The body is empty, as specified in the mapping. The image is preserved. The post is an image with a descriptive title, fitting the allowed content types. No Reddit references are present. No personal perspective is used. This is not an AMA or self-promotion.

    Is that enough evidence? What else do you want?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago*

    Don't know where that came from, you could just click on their account and see it for yourself. Or you know, just scroll up and see their LLM reply.

    I literally just asked what evidence you wanted me to provide, not sure why you're so upset about that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent