▲ 656 ▼ Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley News (news.berkeley.edu) submitted 1 day ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 176 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children) a computer doesn't 'own up' to anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 0 points 1 day ago Any series of events where something makes an error and then though a process of trial and error or reasoning from facts to arrive at a correct destination. Then accurately state the error, the reason why it was made then the steps to correct it. Is "owning up". Your giving moral weight and ethics to a phrase used in a way that was not intended to carry any in context. At best your being stubborn, at worse your trolling. We can all agree the dumb slop machines aren't people and anthropomorphicizing them is dumb. But take the statement in the way he clearly intended and he's not wrong. Models are at the point they will noticed they are wrong and self correct 9 times out of 10. If given the resources, tools, knowledge to know it's a error and see it. The bigger problem is bad user input. Ask a stupid question get a stupid result. Even if the best case is a mediocre result. Thats still good enough . permalink fedilink source parent [–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today -1 points 1 day ago This is pathetic. I have been working with an AI, and there are many bugs and oversights that it acknowledges and addresses, ultimately creating a final product. Frankly, you are in denial. If I had a choice of interns to hire and you were one of them, I would have ruled out hiring you. This is because your lack of objective reality would undermine any project, be it purely human or involving AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 0 points 1 day ago Any series of events where something makes an error and then though a process of trial and error or reasoning from facts to arrive at a correct destination. Then accurately state the error, the reason why it was made then the steps to correct it. Is "owning up". Your giving moral weight and ethics to a phrase used in a way that was not intended to carry any in context. At best your being stubborn, at worse your trolling. We can all agree the dumb slop machines aren't people and anthropomorphicizing them is dumb. But take the statement in the way he clearly intended and he's not wrong. Models are at the point they will noticed they are wrong and self correct 9 times out of 10. If given the resources, tools, knowledge to know it's a error and see it. The bigger problem is bad user input. Ask a stupid question get a stupid result. Even if the best case is a mediocre result. Thats still good enough . permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today -1 points 1 day ago This is pathetic. I have been working with an AI, and there are many bugs and oversights that it acknowledges and addresses, ultimately creating a final product. Frankly, you are in denial. If I had a choice of interns to hire and you were one of them, I would have ruled out hiring you. This is because your lack of objective reality would undermine any project, be it purely human or involving AI. permalink fedilink source parent