you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

They never comprehend. They ingest information and find close approximations for responses, but they don't comprehend any part of the process. If they did, they wouldn't hallucinate complete bullshit answers and spit them out like they were fact

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    To be honest human spew bullshit all the time when they do not understand something. Or people are confidently incorrect all the time as they are remembering incorrectly. The amount of bullshitting is more a meter for intelligence, not something that discriminate between intelligence or the lack thereof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    You are anthropomorphizing LLMs: This is a mistake. They are not people and they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things. Even calling it "AI" is misleading at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (6 children)

    I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.

    You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I don't need to explain shit, you're the one made the claims and didn't provide proof. The burden of proof is on you. We can (and should) dismiss your baseless unproven claims about "AI" outright.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Do you even know what a claim is?

    they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things.

    This is a claim. You made a claim. My assertion that you need to substantiate your claim definitionally does not constitute a claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Bullshit: The claim was made without evidence, I dismissed baseless claim.

    Not even close to being the same. Do YOU know what a claim is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Please quote the claim I made you disputed, I will try to defend it or drop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn't been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing "AI" so we are free to dismiss them outright.

    Furthermore, you're now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    You are doing everything yourself 😂

    I easily quoted your claim, you failed to do the same with mine. So I guess it is you who is dropping your claim. Seriously come to grips with reality and logic.

  • source
  • parent