Ridesharing is an improvement on some of the problems of privately owned cars. Its more equitable and accessible. It saves the necessity of giant parking lots.
Public transit is even better!
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
568 points (99.0% liked)
Fuck Cars
12020 readers
1028 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ridesharing, yes. Not uber taxi with exploitation
Free ride sharing (eg hitchhiking) is better than cheap ride sharing (eg blabla car) which is better then expensive ride sharing (eg a taxi) which - but all are better than there only beingprivately owned cars that are exclusively privately used.
Or, you know, public transport ;)
But yeah, it's true. I use carsharing if I feally need a car and public transport/biking most of the time.
If you can plan a bit ahead, ridesharing/transportation is one of the most popular services in US timebanks.
Disclosure: I am a founding board member of a timebank that uses hOurworld software.
Yes, in principle. However, uber have a well known history of skirting labour laws, skirting taxi laws and doing so to undermine competition and then jack up prices. Risesharing is better than owning a car, but monopolies in how that works are not good for anyone except uber.
My high school econ teacher pointed out that New York used to have a fixed number of taxi licenses.This made competition illegal and kept the price up.
Everywhere. That’s not a nyc problem.
Ubers success is largely from breaking this customer unfriendliness. I use uber because the app is more convenient and effective than finding a taxi and trying to tell them where to go. Uber is less expensive, I can track the route if I disagree with it, and I have the opportunity to give feedback. At least as importantly, uber is far more common than taxis were. From a customer perspective, it’s a pretty good deal.
However they bent a lot of laws to get there, and exploit their drivers. Limited taxi medallions were originally in place to establish standards for customer service mandate service to underserved areas, on the one hand and to support reasonable wages on the other, although likely got captured by the industry. Every “gig economy” business is bending employee/contractor law and most are likely dependent on violating minimum wages, benefits and worker protection laws, what little we have of that.
Downtown I can get an uber in minutes, while there were never enough taxis. Here in the suburbs it takes a long time to get an uber, but medallions always required there be taxis on duty (I actually don’t know if taxis are still in business here). I imagine coverage is even worse in less populated or les desirable parts of the country, and that’s one of the things we lost with taxis
I don't know about NYC specifically, but that's pretty common. Not only were there a set amount, there are set fees and minimum standards and requirements for people with disabilities and police checks for drivers etc.
Uber circumvented a lot of those rules. The taxi industry was due for an update and vested interests were preventing that. However, we've exchanged one monopoly for another. And now, instead of lots of small business owners, we have one large business andots of wage slaves and surge pricing.
Define ridesharing. I think of e.g. sharing a ride to work or school and not people working, often full-time, with sharing rides
Fediverse rideshare? Maybe. Not sure how the liabilities would fall.
When tiktok did this, politicians took that as a sign to further ban efforts. When does uber get banned?
When it stops being American and stops bribing American politicians, obvs.
Fuck Uber with a broken glass-encrusted dildo. Those Randroid douchebags can die in a fire made of fires.
no need to kink shame
Why tf is Uber notifying people of anything not directly related to a ride they’ve ordered??
Because the entire platform is a tool for violating and grinding into dust existing labor laws. Why would political funding laws be any different?
Walmart near me has put up signs at the check out complaining about some tax.
If I ever went to my local Walmart, I'd turn them around.
If you knock them over, they'll get fixed faster.
Public transit is a direct threat to their shareholders.
This has to be illegal and if it isn't it should be.
Uber is literally a tool for violating labor law.
They'll get away with it, unless someone offers them some masonry.
For some reason tech companies get a pass on a ton of regulations just because they're a different form of whatever they're replacing.
"No no no Ubers not a taxi service it's an app. toooootally different..." /s
If you have money, legality means nothing. Uber has money.
Looks like an app notification
They can send notifications through their app (which you installed and very probably accepted to in the terms and conditions) without any legal concern so yeah no.
Even if you try fighting it they'll just say hey it's your phone man just uninstall the app
But isn't trying to influence public policy illegal?
I don't think so.
When my city had a soda tax, every fucking store put a sign out calling it a war on poor people tax. But it was a $0.10 increase on sugary drinks to add to the educational budget.
Or maybe it is illegal but I live in a shit hole country.
I live in Taiwan and I don't think it's legal for companies to sway policy.
Ah yeah so definitely America is a shit hole country.
In what country? It's pretty normal to see companies lobbying for policy here, or urging people to sign petitions.
I don't know. It just feels like something like this shouldn't be legal
In most of the world it is, and seeing how where it is not is developing, that is a vert god thing.
Outrageous!
It should be a progressive tax topping out way higher than that!
"Secret" yet this was likely voted on at the ballot.
Uber has been fucked since the very beginning.
The Dollop with Dave Anthony and Gareth Reynolds #271 - Uber (NSFW)
Oh no private equity isn't getting it's way.
If it is so secret how come you know about it