this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
221 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

82621 readers
3136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now, some tech job candidates have begun asking about what AI compute budget they will have access to if they decide to join. "I am increasingly asked during candidate interviews how much dedicated inference compute they will have to build with Codex," Thibault Sottiaux, engineering lead at OpenAI's Codex, the startup's AI coding service, wrote on X recently.

Big fucking bullshit. No one ever ask for "AI compute budget", people wants money. Not your coffee, not your foosball game, money.

Guess what you can buy with money? Yeah, that compute time, if desired.

What a fucking load of bullshit.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

They are talking about like internal quotas I believe? Like my friends company is limited to 1000 in spend per month while I have no cap and will blow through 2k in a week if I’m working long hours.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Don't pay people enough money, expect them to buy your products with their non existent money.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

So let me get this straight. Companies were like "instead of paying one senior dev 300k and 5 junior devs 150k, we can get rid of all the junior devs and give the senior dev AI to do all of the legwork thus saving us 750k."

And then they found out that AI costs money. So instead of ponying up the 100k in tokens for the senior dev to to their job, they are saying "Hey senior dev, we are taking away your bonus and replacing it with tokens! You can take it or be out of a job, because we refuse to keep anybody on board who doesn't use AI to replace 5 junior devs"

So these cheap fucks saved 750k, and are upset with the fact that they might only save 650k?

While also destroying the planet to generate shitty code.

I fucking hate this time line.

[–] bebabalula@feddit.dk 2 points 20 hours ago

Company that sells random collections of words: People are increasingly asking for random collections of words instead of money!

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

But that's just crypto again, isn't it? They tried the same bullshit.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Hey. AI. Go to the store and buy me food.

Hmmm. Doesn’t work.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

What a bunch of fucking idiots.

[–] entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf 26 points 1 day ago

Corporate owned media promoting a story about making you rely on tokens to outwork your coworkers so you don’t lose your job is the dumbest shit I’ve ever read.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Gee guys... Did you maybe build a whole bunch of compute capacity for a product no one actually wants, and now you have to find a way to use it for something?

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I remember when silicon valley used to build products that would help people improve their lives.

The reaper or capitalist enshittification comes for all industries eventually.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

When was this

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a brief, coincidental alignment of silicon valley's goals and human progress.

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

The chief marketing officer for AI, Bill Ofgoods, thinks this is a great idea and the CFO, Peg Inapoke, agrees. Brooklyn Bridge was unavailable for comment

[–] entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 day ago

Oh my god Iran. Just send the drones already

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

they are already using AI to screen out applicants, im t surprised they dint do it in the first place.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 249 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“You can spend your scrip at the company store.”

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You burn 16 tokens and what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

You burn 16 tokens and what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in tech debt.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Tell Berners Lee that I can't go

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

For the company.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 121 points 3 days ago (3 children)

OpenAI exec highlights the rising importance of AI compute in tech job compensation.

In other news, Roblox executive thinks that having companies pay employees partly in Robux would be a great idea.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago

It's a really dumb way to frame what the OpenAI people actually said on this - they are saying that the people applying to them want to know how many tokens they can use as a tool to accomplish the job they are applying for. There's a fundamental difference to compensation here to compensation, where tokens as compensation would be how many tokens the people applying for the job would be able to utilize for their own purposes, whatever they may be.

To illustrate - I would probably be reluctant to work for a company which would not be willing to spend the amount of money that would get me a more or less top of the line computer with which to perform my job. Not because I consider my company-provided development machine as a part of my compensation - it is merely a tool I use for my job.

The people applying for these jobs are the kinds of people who think that burning an exorbitant amount of tokens will make them quite significantly more productive, so the metaphor of having the best tools available to accomplish the task at hand extends here, in accordance with their belief system.

There's then the quote from the VC ghouls, but I don't think anyone could accuse them of being competent to any significant degree, so their quotes are most appropriately used as toilet paper.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 days ago

altr Yeah, I make 100,000 robux per year, get in bitches

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 74 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Construction companies should pay bricklayers in bricks and mortar

Uber should pay drivers in gas

Restaurants should pay chefs in raw ingredients

This is a radical idea, but maybe employers should be responsible for providing the supplies and tools their employees need to do their jobs? And the employees can just get money in return for their labor?

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ceos get paid in empty promises and bad decisions?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

"People like you aren't in for the money!" -- always and only said by people who are in for the money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Sorry, my mortgage servicer doesn't accept AI slop as payment, so I'll just take the money"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe instead of food we can be paid in ozempic (to reduce appetite) and a very very tiny amount of food. all humanity would become very skinny, and then theres less health care costs due to obesity.

I should really be in charge here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 100 points 2 days ago (1 children)

God this timeline is so fucking dumb

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

It's malicious, not dumb. The dumb is a side effect.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 74 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I can't wait till these companies start falling over so I can stop hearing about their ridiculous shit

[–] WanderingThoughts 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It starts to sound like the Romans giving out VIP seats for the Colosseum while you see the smoke and the first flames on the horizon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

I can't wait till these companies start falling over so I can stop hearing about their ridiculous shit

If you have a 401k, selling "Large-Cap" indexes or "Full market" indexes can help. (and buying something else, don't leave it uninvested, obviously).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

AI companies who can't find anyone to buy their product, swear their employees would rather have their product in exchange for labor rather than money...

Which could easily be used to buy the product no one outside the company is buying.

This is just a way to juice metrics and claim this "compensation" as sales on the books.

And I'm almost positive the "per user growth" they're talking about is just how brain rot addicts will use chatbots for everything once their brain atrophies from not using it. But just by mentioning that they had to admit that overall use wasn't a metric they wanted to talk about.

It's like how a small percentage of drinkers (the alcoholics) buy the vast amount of alcohol. Less people drinking is bad for the company, and a few alcoholics can't sustain the company without being replaced by new addicts.

Edit:

Also, isn't this literally a plot point from Silicon Valley?

Like, their desperation move to get funding at some point was handing out compute tokens, but the only people who wanted to buy it was their competitors because non of the companies had customers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 32 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Imagine having tech employees beg their employers for a work computer. That's basically what this article is suggesting.

I see a big silver lining on this cloud though: unlike a work computer, apparently AI subscriptions are not self-evidently worth having:

"It is starting to happen," Tunguz told me, as employee use of AI increasingly contributes to total cash burn. "It is a consideration for the Office of the CFO."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

Fuck sake, dont you all get it. The point in this kind of AI is massive data harvesting and tie it all together.

It wont go away, because that would mean you'll get some privacy back. You wont.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley is buzzing about this new idea: Slavery

FIFY

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

With Levels.fyi pegging the 75th percentile software engineer salary at $375,000, Tunguz estimates that adding $100,000 in annual inference costs brings the fully loaded cost to $475,000 — meaning just over 20% of the compensation cost could come from AI usage in the future.

and later

Tunguz has been building AI tools and models into his daily workflow and is automating 31 tasks a day at a cost of about $12,000 a year in inference.

This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won't see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won’t see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

These days an annual salary of $100k is at the very low end for most IT jobs in the USA (beyond the junior level). Even in my MCOL area $125k-$200k is more common.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These dudes seriously seem to have zero clue about being a human being.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Hey you know what I could use to buy compute or literally anything else

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are going full panic mode now. The crash has already begun.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Trump bombed the bubble.

Awesome! Now they can lose money and get wrong answers at the same time!

load more comments
view more: next ›