this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
448 points (99.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

30682 readers
1208 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 175 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, that’s the new hexadecimal IPV8

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago
[–] dracs@programming.dev 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

I try to avoid "this" style comments, but I genuinely don't know how else to respond to this one. It was hilarious. I literally (by which I actually mean "literally") laughed out loud.

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hello, I am apparently an idiot. What is wrong with that IP address that people can tell it's an immediate phishing scam?

[–] Turious@leaf.dance 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IP addresses can't have segment numbers going over 255.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, IPv4 addresses use four bytes. Those four bytes are represented as four decimal numbers, separated by dots. And a byte can only represent the decimal values 0–255.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

IPv4 was easy to remember. IPv6 made it very hard. This implies that IPv8 has to be base64 encoded.

[–] ghodawalaaman@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

wait what? I feel like I am left behind in the tech. I only know about ipv4 and ipv6 😭😭😭

[–] tyler@programming.dev 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re making a joke. The numbers in the IP are way too high for v4, but the format isn’t v6, so it’s a “new range” of v8.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

at 192.512.512.10.0/42.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

In the drawer right next to IPv5

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 159 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I often assume this kind of thing is part of an effort to filter for idiots

If you know that's an invalid IP address, you're probably less likely to fall for the scam after the scammer has put the setup work in. So if they filter you out before a scammer has to spend any actual effort on you, that means more time they can spend scamming people who might be more likely to fall for it

That's why these things often have egregious spelling errors and other seemingly obvious red flags

[–] zo0@programming.dev 77 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just because I know what a valid IP is doesn't mean I'm not an idiot 😎

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Let's see you write a regex for one, then we'll decide.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

Why would anyone want to do that when there are dozens on stackoverflow?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do believe that is confirmed canon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's possible in general, but I don't think that's what's going on specifically here; not many people read IP addresses in such detail to notice such things at first glance.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s exactly what is happening, they’re filtering out people who know what an IP address is and can contain so that they get fewer time wasters.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point schnurrito was making is that even if you know what an IP address is and what are valid or invalid IP addresses, a lot of people won't read the IP address. They'll just see numbers and skim over them. Even if you're keeping eyes peeled for scams, most people don't have their IP address memorised off the top of their heads so they wouldn't be looking to check if the IP address looks right or not.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And the point I’m making is that they’re doing it to filter out people who know and pay attention. Real simple stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

Movies and TV shows actually do it this way to prevent actual machines getting group hugged.

Like in that one X-Files episode, where the Lone Gunmen hack into an invalid IP.

[–] sniggleboots 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's also why there's usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 104 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not often you see IPv5

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 weeks ago

It's good to see someone in this thread who knows what an IPv5 address looks like:

IPv5 addresses consist of four hextets a 16bit each.  For the visual
representation, those grouping are used.  The hextets might be
written in decimal, separated by dot '.' characters, or as
hexadecimal numbers, separated by colon ':'.

It's long past time to start replacing our IPv4.1 deployments!

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In addition to what others have already posted, I suspect that this might be an attempt to evade spam/phishing filters that are looking for an IP address with a specific regular expression. Having a fake IP address that doesn’t match the traditional ^((25\[0-5]|(2\[0-4]|1\d|\[1-9]|)\d)\\.?\b){4}$ format might let this message slip through.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

And it hooks tech illiterate people, avoiding people who know something's wrong. The perfect target.

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 week ago

This is just an IPv5, they're quite rare in the wild

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Took me a second to figure out what was wrong with the email... I choked on a laugh when I saw the IP

What a bizarre, narrow window of knowledge that person must have

[–] ThetaDecay@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alternatively, the scammer is saving themselves some time; more educated, well-versed people will see the ip and not bother calling in. Less savvy people who don't know the IP address is bogus are likely easier to scam if they call the phone number or reply to the mail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

That's exactly the reaction they want. That aspect of the scam helps filter out people who might be smart enough to properly retaliate if they were to get scammed out of 20k or whatever.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 42 points 2 weeks ago

New address space unlocked

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For the uninitiated, the joke is:

spoilerEach number should has a maximum value of 255.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

The fact that I have a test in school today, and this is probable questiom in it, and this post reminded me of it,  thanks I guess?

EDIT: wait, so each number should be maximum of 255? Why did I think it was just the last numbe :|

anyway thanks again for the unsolicited coincidental heads up

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm still angry even 15 years later after a teacher lowered my grade just because I checked "USB" as capable technologies for video transmission. There are literally USB monitors.

Granted, back then it really wasn't popular and bandwidth was shit, but it was capable of it.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

USB to VGA dongles were definitely a thing over 15 years ago. USB 2.0 could manage it fineish. Maybe not at high resolutions and refresh rates, but it could handle a monitor just fine.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Jesus Christ, that’s Jason Bourne’s IP address!

[–] entwine@programming.dev 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, that's my IP. I was trying something

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

Please, do not share the button. It's gross.

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

no shit they don't recognize that IP :-D but hey, they also single handedly solved the IP4 address space crisis!

[–] shawn@thagoat.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

That cancer support line should buy this one also

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] python@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Ok I admit I didn't get it at first because I expected the joke to be that the IP is 127.0.0.1 and didn't look closer at the digits

[–] Janx@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

I think I see why the login attempt was unsuccessful!

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They just wanted to make doubly sure that whoever they are phishing is an idiot before they proceed further.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Spain has better food, better beaches, hotter women, better fiesta, better weather, better lifestyle, better IP's.

Deal with it.

load more comments
view more: next ›