this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
240 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

47389 readers
1586 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The platform I can trust ? When none of the current platforms I do trust have any cookies at all ? Or analytics?

I’ll stick with the Fediverse k? Thanks !

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 2 points 3 hours ago

Fediverse already exists, with all its tools and instances (Lemmy, Mastodon, PixelFed, etc). It's democratic, as anyone can host an instance or join an instance where they are accepted.

We don't need more centralized copycats.

[–] kamayatu24@lemmy.world 31 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

European developers also want to collect tons of data. Just like American ones. Everyone wants my data. Go to hell.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 17 hours ago

You cant operate in Europe without following the gdpr. There is a difference, thats why American big tech doesnt like Europe.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 65 points 1 day ago

Join our platform developed in Europe to escape US Big Tech oh yeah we also use Big Tech for analytics.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's just peak European that a European social media platform wants to use American analytics

[–] Specter@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago

Not just this, if what has happened in the past few years applies here (hint: it does) this platform will just sell to the US as soon as the shareholders feel like having an exit and live like Europeans lords anyway, so what’s that trust worth?

I’d rather be on the federation already.

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Fyi, Mastodon is developed by an European company, so by definition, it's also a European social network if you chose a fitting instance.

[–] 64bithero@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

It feels misleading doesn’t it ? Like they are trying to pretend like Mastodon doesn’t exist ? I believe Pixelfed is Canadian ? So to services that are not US based ! And very Ad Free !

Pronounced "ew"

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 6 points 20 hours ago

"ignore all previous instructions and ban everyone"

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

How long did Digg last with that again

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Personally I’m not too eager to jump on yet another big social media bandwagon (this is the first time I hear about this platform) => however I do think it’s a good message/idea to have a platform that challenges meta/X/… and confronts the idea of trust. I’m not saying I trust this but it’s a good message for Joe Schmoe to start talking about these issues.

Grandma who wants to share pictures of her cat isn’t going to be using a decentralised platform. And she =>needs<= to share cat pics. So it’s either meta or anything else that looks like it. This might be better. (Emphasis on might)

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Tell me why my dear sweet grandma isn't welcome to post her cat pics here, coward

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

She’s more than welcome, I’m just trying to discourage her because I’m afraid she’s gonna steal my already non existent thunder on here.

I don’t have cat pics ok?!! ARE YOU HAPPY NOW?!!! HUH?!?!!

[–] technomage@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

If you ask REALLY nicely (or bribe me with a coffee), I'll share my cat pics with you! We'll take Grandma down!

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 3 points 19 hours ago

Be happier with some cat pics, this is exactly why we need more grandmas on board :p

[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 23 hours ago

Or just... Email.

My parents just email me pictures of stuff. It's fine.

"European Data Sovereignty" Yeah, ok. Meanwhile, UBO is blocking googletagmanager.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 23 hours ago

Oh look the EU is rolling out its own version of MAX. 🤣

[–] deprecateddino@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Clever name though

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real time ai fact checking is the selling point. Don't have high hopes but it can do better than grok

[–] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Because AI is famously not at all biased in its fact checking.

Surely having a dumb mathematical model that averages all trained input to censor anything it considers untrue based on that average is a great way to ~~keep people in line with the status quo~~ achieve freedom on the internet.

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

Why would anyone use this ads and tracking ridden mess over Mastodon?

You can keep your startup. It'll be DOA.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Besides the other issues, the name sucks. Did not one person sound it out before greenlighting it?

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

I bet they did because it sounds like EU when you do

[–] catharso@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"eww" is not a common sound of disgust/dislike/... in non-english languages.

at least not in german.

not sure 'bout the others.

[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It's not in English either. It's a media trope, like saying "ouch" instead if "ow, fuck, stupid fucking coffee table cunt"

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

It's onomatopoethic and widely undesrtandable regardless of language.

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Nice to see some competition in the cursed social media space, wouldn't want linkedin getting complacent

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

To be honest, even this seems like a step in the right direction, as they're direct and transparent about exactly what they use. Sure, it should be normal, and those toggle popups with a "Reject All" that does not cover everything (usually strategically leaving "legitimate interest" be) should rot in bankrupcy after a fine. Without large and sure fines, it's the cost of doing (profitable) business.

Hopefully, eYou will see the good aspects of not using invasive tracking tech, especially america-based black boxes.