top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 250 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 208 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it's "an honest bump" to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

    Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Web browsing is the real murder here.. and i dont want to know how much memory is solely spent on ads

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    The week after GDPR went into effect was amazing. Almost nobody was ready, so they just turned off all their ads and tracking for European IPs while they figured it out. Pages loaded pretty much instantly.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    I'm concerned about in-system bloat because I read the linked article.

    Rather, it’s more of an honesty bump. Components that make up the distro – the GNOME desktop and extensions, modern web browsers (and the sites we load in them) and the kinds of apps we use (and keep running) whilst multitasking are more demanding.

    The desktop itself isn't the only reason that you need more RAM, but it's definitely one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 121 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    They’re raising it because of RAM needs of browsers and GNOME.

    If you’re a shell nerd like me, you’ll still be fine running it on a potato.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 76 points 6 months ago (30 children)

    Great move in these times where RAM is cheap and widely available

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 61 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I don't immediately hate it. It's been a while since any laptops/prebuilds shipped with less than 8 GB, and there's distros out there far better suited to running on low power or legacy hardware.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 51 points 6 months ago

    In this economy?

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 6 months ago

    So basically the system requirements of Chrome.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    "HERE'S A NICKLE, KID. GET YOURSELF A BETTER COMPUTER."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago (6 children)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 21 points 6 months ago (12 children)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's pretty much what a browser needs these days.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Me with 16 GB on my computer

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Fun thing, I just booted up an old computer. Started right up. It had Ubuntu 11.10 on it.

    Now, I obviously didn't connect the thing to the Internet. Updates would have probably failed hard. Not because it's missing over a decade of updates so there might be some complications on that front, but because it's a Pentium III with Definitely Not Even a Gigabyte of memory. (Oh and a Nvidia GeForce 2 MX. I'm pretty sure that's not supported by... any driver any more.)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    This doesn't seem so bad, though. 2 GB more in about 10 years is pretty reasonable in terms of an increase.

    It's not like they doubled it.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Use Debian if you want a system like Ubuntu that isn't full of Canonical's corporate shit. Ubuntu is based on Debian.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Shocked i got this far without someone blaming snaps

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    When I built my current rig a few years back (when I still used Windows and Photoshop), I said, "RAM is cheap enough, and more is better, but don't go overboard."

    That's how I ended up with 64GB of RAM.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago
    1. Everything is a framework under a framework running on a pseudo virtual machine. 6 GB are just for the notepad and the mouse driver.
  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    Meanwhile on my raspberrypi 4 running Ubuntu server:

    screenshot showing 800M RAM usage

    And my tablet running stock Ubuntu:

    screenshot showing 2.3G RAM usage

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I'm ok with this - lubuntu has my back.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    8GB was barely enough 10 years ago. That's when I switched to Arch+KDE. Then KDE started using more. memory.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›