this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
126 points (97.7% liked)

News

37401 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll announced plans to deploy small modular reactors (SMRs) on Guam and other facilities in the Indo-Pacific region. According to him, the installations are expected to be operational at bases no later than 2028. The main goal of the project, called Janus, is to provide fully autonomous power supply for remote garrisons, where civilian grids are chronically overloaded and unreliable. The issue of electricity shortages is particularly acute in island territories such as Guam, which serves as a key hub for U.S. forces in the region. Defense experts openly state that the deployment of SMRs is aimed at preparing for a potential confrontation with China. As Beijing expands not only its nuclear arsenal but also its long-range strike capabilities to disrupt traditional maritime supply routes, the dependence of bases on diesel fuel deliveries is becoming a critical vulnerability. Pentagon analysts have repeatedly noted that, in the event of a conflict, communication lines to Guam would come under direct threat from the missile forces of the People’s Liberation Army. Under such conditions, only compact nuclear installations capable of operating for several years without refueling and without the need for constant fuel deliveries can ensure the uninterrupted functioning of radars, communications systems, and other infrastructure in isolation. In May 2025, a presidential order set a deadline to launch the first such reactor at a military site by September 30, 2028. As early as October, the U.S. Army officially began implementing the Janus program, which involves adapting civilian SMR technologies for military needs. Local lawmakers in Guam and environmental groups point to another concern: they argue that storing nuclear fuel on an island within range of Chinese missiles is too dangerous, and that in the event of a military conflict, it could inevitably lead to large-scale radioactive contamination of the territory.

https://neutronbytes.com/2025/10/19/army-goes-nuclear-microreactors-set-for-us-bases-by-2028/

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This would be a great way to prove their use. The US Navy has had zero radiological incidents in its entire history. Other parts of the Navy have significant management issues, but whatever they're doing to maintain the culture in the nuclear program is clearly working.

[–] Wxfisch@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s a combination of conservative designs, robust training, and a zero tolerance safety stance where even minor misses that have any relationship to the reactor or power systems get throughly investigated through a formal process that seeks to understand and learn from mistakes rather than assign blame.

If anyone is curious, the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) publishes the Gray Book with some history of the Program, the various arms that are involved to make it successful, and how the Program is managed including training, suppliers, labs, and fleet operations and maintenance.

Turn the Ship Around is a leadership book that also touches on safety and operations of a nuclear sub and is just a good read overall if your looking for a different way to think about bringing a leader in an organization.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The time the Army tried this under Greenland without anyone's knowledge didn't turn out great, but at least nothing exploded.

They did manage to leave a crap ton of Nuclear waste under the ice where it would "probably be fine". Which is now melting, which was nice of them.

Not saying more modern designs / operational plans couldn't be great but their track record isn't not concerning.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Plus if/when these catch on more, you're going to have all kinds of organizations both public and private needing to dispose of radioactive chemical waste with a half life of 25,000 years. I may be a cynic, but I have zero faith that any public or private organization is going to properly account for that and it will be us, the public, who will suffer the consequences both in funding the cleanup as well as the health effects of having it dumped in our backyard by some fly by night company that 'closes' right before the lawsuits start and then reopens under a new name.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not sure if you've followed it, but there is a somewhat similar project in Wyoming by TerraPower - Source

I believe it counts as an smr and is breaking ground this year (if not already).

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For now? There's always a 100% success rate until there's not. But also, I know nothing about thus topic. I'm just a pessimist in this world.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

There’s also a 100% failure rate until there’s not, that doesn’t mean anything except that nothing happens until it happens.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see what Donnie Deals plans to unleash on our satraps, given the grab bag of Tech Creeps and startup scammers involved.

Curious to know what the cost per kwh is going to be for these things.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Putin called me. He says we need to remove the control rods. 'Remove them all!' he said, and we're going too because that Putin's a smart guy. Chernobyl would have never happened with him running the place.... I love that Putin. Good man, one of the best...."

If you haven't already go back and read it in his voice.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Impossible not to read that in his voice

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They better make them very secure then, because if those get blown up the troops will face a totally new category of problems.

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

The troops? Who gives a shit about the troops, what about the people living in the region?

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

How are they going to doploy a reactor if they can't even deploy food for their troops?

yesss, get as many reactors within Shathead range as possible

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Don't pull out the control rod too far, lest ye become a ceiling decoration.