this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
915 points (99.7% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump isn’t attending the dignified transfer of four American soldiers who died in Lithuania, because he has instead chosen to attend a Saudi-backed golf tournament at his country club in Doral, Florida.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

The amount of news articles that make me laugh have been steadily increasing.

What a clownly country.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

US politics is a fucking comedy. My colleague pulled up the picture of Trump standing with that goofy tariff board where trump is reading all the countries and how many percentages they would be tariffed. My colleague was absolutely cackling at the picture and kept saying "the supposedly richest country in the world and they announce this shit that will affect all of us on a piece of fucking cardboard????!!" 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I hate the guy but damn is he funny. Everything he says is a meme. He's absolutely a prime example of what america is all about. Him sitting in a tesla and saying: it's a computers. And : I love Tessler is just too funny. And they voted for him twice. I just can't

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 1 points 2 minutes ago

Do you have links for that please? I want to laugh

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For real. To me, Trump is the embodiment of the American stereotype. I know Americans think that the rest of the world stereotype them as being fat, but no no no no, sweethearts. The behavior Trump exhibits is the American stereotype on crack. I am pretty xenophobic toward America (sorry, not sorry) and have been since Bush, but even I could not have come up with a more cartoony and offensive American stereotype than the Trump persona.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Same, but Bush was a fucking rocket scientist in comparison. If someone told me that in the Bush area that thy'll find someone way WAY dumber to elect. TWICE.

I would've never believed that. No way.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 24 minutes ago

Oh same. I stayed up all night during the 2016 election and when Trump won I was laughing hysterically because I couldn't believe what I was seeing and hearing.

My sweet, lovely and amazing boyfriend told me during this election that Harris would win because the Americans wouldn't put up with the abortion stuff and I just told him that I thought he was overestimating the American population. He's always thought my American hatred was too unnuanced and unfair, but I mean... I have been right so far. Which isn't really the win I was hoping for. I was actually hoping to be proven wrong at least once in my fucking lifetime, but eh.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 hours ago

I said the first time he was elected that, love him or hate him, you have to admit that he is an accurate caricature of America.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 15 points 9 hours ago

he said they are suckers and losers, and whats in for them, more than one occasion.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 20 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Is it wrong that I am less infuriated by this than I am by the fact people still worship this idiot?

At this point, I am exhausted with being outraged by him. I cannot hate him more than I already do. Doing more evil shit may actually make me hate him less, because I simply cannot keep up to date with all the new reasons to hate him. But I cannot comprehend how millions of people can function in the world while still behaving like everything he does is objectively right. Not even the truly repulsive, monstrous shit, but the petty, insufferable bullshit like this. How do you excuse it? It do not comprehend how anyone can look at this and say, "Yeah, this guy should have nigh-unlimited power over the country and the ability to throw the world into chaos with a Tweet."

[–] cdnwaffleiron@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 minutes ago
[–] Mouette@jlai.lu 2 points 2 hours ago

I think it is important to laugh at the funny demonstrative shit because if you keep getting outraged for every unimportant thing that is done like the Gulf of America thing you're not heard when outraging for actual things that matter like deporting people or silencing opposition

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I remember the "Troops for Trump" that would set up from time to time. Never understood it. He's disrespected them multiple times.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 9 hours ago

he did offer them to putins mercanaries before, when they put out hits on them.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

he doesn't wear a tan suit though so it's ok

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 41 points 16 hours ago

Golfing with the fucking Russian oligarchs is more important than honoring dead US soldiers. Fuck Krasnov.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 22 points 15 hours ago

Nero fiddling as Rome burns.

[–] Scottyc65@lemmy.studio 29 points 17 hours ago

They were just suckers and losers anyway.

[–] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 237 points 1 day ago (13 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

What does it matter? He has their unwavering support. He could have killed them himself and not lost the military's support.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago

I'm not sure. Certainly, the weirdos who make the military their whole personality back him, but I haven't seen any evidence that he's outstandingly popular with the rank and file and his plans to completely gut the officer corps can't have made him popular there.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

That's not really true. He has the unwavering support of really old veterans who got the same fox news pill as the other boomers. The serving military voted blue in 2020. The Military Times elected not to do a poll in 2024...

There are very vocal service members who support him but the military as a whole does not and is not a fan of Hegseth fucking around in the DoD either. For example one published plan has us divesting our only mobile firepower platforms (strykers), just as the war in Ukraine is making everyone else want them. And F-47 did not go unnoticed either. The Air Force went from a study wondering if we needed NGAD to selecting a vendor without a flyoff and naming it. That thing is going to get ditched January 21st 2029. Then Hegseth is fucking around with physical fitness tests which is actually promotions, schools, and unit qualifications. This is making the most deadly parts of military dislike him. For example we've had women working with Delta for 20 years. First of all Delta isn't giving them up, 20 years ago women were officially banned from combat and that didn't stop them. Second it just conditions them to be anti-administration. So when they get ordered to go get an American "insurgent" who held a sign outside a Tesla dealership one too many times, they may just refuse.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Soldiers refusing to follow orders because they do not like the government? Sorry but that sounds delusional. Sure they might be slightly less harsh, but that is it.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nearly 60% of active duty voted for him for his second term. This is not much change from the percentages for 2016 and 2020.

They may be regretting their choice but I see no indication they wouldn't make the same choice.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

military members are notoriously conservative, additionally they source thier fodder from rural and red areas, and usually are mostly white. 2ndary targets are disadvantaged POCs areas, especially the ones that cant pay for colleges.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 70 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Hopefully they remember that when the time comes to make choices.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 80 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

We knew this from the last time around

Evidence suggests they do not make the correct choice

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Trump hates everything that is not Donald J. Trump.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Hey, that's not fair. He's also weirdly into Ivanka Trump.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 18 hours ago

Hard to embezzle money from the taxpayers for events that aren't at your place.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 89 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

“Suckers and losers…”

Now watch this drive

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›