Hrmmm πŸ€” (europe.pub)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

(original photo removed.)

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 263 points 5 months ago (19 children)

this image is photoshopped. i can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    That's correct. I checked with David Photoshop and he confirmed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    There is something about his face that doesn't look natural but I'm not quite sure if it's Photoshop or AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 73 points 5 months ago* (9 children)

    I bet he thinks ice cream is correlated with the violent crime too

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Violent crime precedes ice cream consumption. Clearly crime makes people hungry for ice cream.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 73 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    That "teacher" has interpretation, extrapolation, and interpolation issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 42 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Teaching students to not conflate correlation with causation by pointing out absurd assumptions of causality from real correlations.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    My favourite argument is that; The amount of people buying ice creams and the amount of people drowning also looks like curves that follow each other. But less ices creams will not make less people drown. They both go up because of good weather conditions. They do not influence each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    The historical version of this was the ww2 airplane patch job stats, where american bombers returning after getting hit were hit in specific areas and the statistician had to explain that those who returned despite that damage meant those were not the places to reinforce but the other areas of the plane makeing it more survivable, or more recently how Santa Monica CA almost removed crosswalks because that was where the highest pedestrian mortally rates were. In both those cases the people making the assumptions missed the bigger picture, for the planes that those who got hit in more sensitive spots got downed and for pedestrians getting killed at crosswalks that was because that is where pedestrians cross the street most of the time, almost leading to more deaths.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Probably trying to make a point that correlation and causation are not always related.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    The fuckig disrespect to barely blur this man's face and post him in a photoshopped t-shirt that makes him look like a piece of shit.

    What the fuck is wrong with you? What did this man do to you that you would post this online? You think that blur job is doing anything?

    "Relax, it's just a joke"

    PEOPLES LIVES HAVE BEEN RUINED FOR THIS KIND OF SHIT! All it takes is one dumbfuck to not see that it's a joke to cause a problem. One parent who complains to the admin who grill this guy for no reason. One shithead student who starts a rumor about him.

    Fuck you OP. I hope someone plasters YOUR shitty blurred face all over the internet and tries to tie YOU to being a racist, elitist, piece of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    The only thing I can say is that I didn't think through what I was doing. That's not an excuse though.

    As soon as I came back here and say your comment something in my head snapped and what you were saying made complete sense. I immediately erased it and will make every attempt to think through posts that may be problematic in the future before I post them.

    Totally my fault.

    :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It's the Correlation vs Causation T-shirt.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago

    I believe the correct answer to OPs question is "an object lesson in the difference between correlation and causality.

    Or proof he doesn't understand that difference, whichever applies.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    A shirt that screams that correlation =/= causation.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    This needs a Hide The Pain Harold faceswap.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Even though you could argue the graphs are right, that still does not mean the variables are related in some way.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    It's a round about way of expressing that correlation does not imply causation. It was done so that everytime someone shares this meme of a guy wearing a T-shirt over his flannel, someone in the audience can explain that the graphs intentionally represent a fallacy.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    I had the post loaded earlier from scrolling on the toilet and now that I'm scrolling on the toilet again the post has been removed but I have the original photo in my feed still so here it is if you are confused, without the dude's face

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Wait, did you know that there's a direct correlation between the decline of Spirograph and the rise in gang activity?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    He's wearing correlation without causation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Clearly he has studied history.

  • source
  • So that's what Dr Breen has been up to.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί