Yes, but, if you can’t produce plausible bullshit on your own you’re not going to get very far.
Microblog Memes
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
if 90% of jobs can be replaced by AI bullshit, why tf do we even need to work? Why shape society so you must do shitty non existent jobs to survive?
May I introduce you to the work of David Graeber on this exact subject? Bullshit Jobs
Automation should enable UBI, in a decent society. But since our current leaders will never implement UBI, automation is a crime against the working class who need jobs to survive.
Correct answer, we are already in the UBI realm of not needing enough workers. The question is where the world goes from here. I'm currently betting on some dystopian societal structure we're 90% of people are fucked. So glad I'm older without kids.
if 90% of jobs can be replaced by AI bullshit
Well, to start, they can't.
At least not by these LLMs that keep getting touted as AI.
The thing that this person seems to have either forgotten, or not understood in the first place, is that homework, and your education in general, is not for the teacher, it's for you. If you choose to cheat your way through you will gain less than if you actually put the work in yourself. This gets more important the further through education you go.
Probably the best outcome for an essay question is if you discuss it with your friends, all share your understanding of the subject, then write it up individually, incorporating anything new you learned from your discussions.
This does come with the issue that those who cheat could end up getting good grades if there is no 'live' check of their understanding, either through closed book exams, class tests, group discussions, or similar.
Indeed, it's not that LLM is totally uncorrelated to factual basis, it is correlated well enough for most educational fodder that is supremely well trodden and doesn't seek surprises. It's practice with backgrounds the teachers can actually already know and credibly provide feedback on. It's so well known that any teacher knows, so it's correlated with AI output that has been trained on verbatim prompts and essays that are on the exact same topic, and so the narrative correlated with the prompt is just very likely to also correlate to the facts of relevance.
Just like a pocket calculator can make short work of elementary school math. It's not that we expect those kids to do some crazy novel stuff that calculators can't do, it's just that they need to operate in a context to actually illustrate they have the foundational understanding.
your education in general, is not for the teacher, it's for you
Most teachers don’t understand that
When I am struggling with Language Arts and excelling at Math, the extra time spent on unmastered Language homework benefits me. The extra time spent on Math serves only to waste my time and distract me from the Language work that needs my central focus.
The intention of homework is to benefit the student. The reality is that most students would be best served by skipping the homework and getting some exercise instead.
In the gradebook, the unit test score should be the floor for all homework scores in that unit. Score a 95% on the test, and even if you turn in zero homework, a 95% should be recorded for each assignment. S
Turn in 95% on each and every homework assignment, but score a 65% on the test? You keep your 95% scores showing you put in the work, even though you clearly haven't mastered the material.
Turn in no homework, and score a 65% on the test? Every homework assignment is now a 65%.
With this system, doing the homework can only help you. Skipping the homework is risky, but allowable.
Homework is not to measure anything is to force you to make the work so your brain develops new connections.
Using AI for homework or study is like bringing a forklift to the gym.
Being able to use exercise equipment with a forklift would be pretty cool tho
That sounds way more fun
Going to a gym to pose as doing exercise while not doing it? Yeah fun.
Bringing a forklift to the gym and trying to pick up all the different shapped weights.
I just spent the afternoon driving 79" helical Piles with a dingo for a solar array, the n grated the land, and since I had an extra hour with the machine , helped landscaping crew on site dig out a trench to plant hedges.
Easily the most fun ive had at work in a month.
Sure, but within the simile that's sitting at the back of the class and laughing with your friends instead of engaging with the lesson. Fun but you didn't gain anything and got in the way of people actually trying.
I suspect a large part of the problem is that, at least in my experience, this is not at all explained to students and often the teachers themselves do it as "something that everybody does" rather than with the understanding that there is an underlying purposed that homework is meant to serve (which sould inform the when, what, how and how much of homework).
If see a similar kind of problem in my area (Software Development) all the time - people doing certain things because "they're good practices", "it's what you're supposed to do" or even "that's what everybody does" without at all understanding the underlying reasons for doing it (and, more importantly, when to do it, when not to do it and how best to do it), which is why for example nowadays you have countless of "Agile" teams that are doing wrong or unecessary (in their context) parts of it whilst not doing the parts that the should do just doing things they think they're supposed to do it but doing them incorrectly since they don't get what those things are supposed to achieve and how.
Mind you, some people are just lazy, so some students will just "optimize away" homework with whatever tools they have to do so, even when knowing the purpose of homework and when being given the most learning-enhancing homework possible.
I mean this is exactly what all the kids who told me they loooved essay questions always said they liked about them.
same, they all love cheating, before AI they would mostly just copy paste eachother's work
and me the alone kid who actually wanted and cared about learning would be drown out in busy work to be done, get bad grades even though I did well in tests and exercises, simply because I failed to do the annoying boring homeowrk of writting an essay that we all know the teacher is not reading, that they just made thjs assigment to give students free grade points because they know that if they didn't half of the students would fail the class, they would go lenghts about how they were being nice by doing this, and yet screwing over me would never be mentioned, one of the few students that ever displayed any form of curiosity in class
It's too bad, now we'll have to replace them with speaking in front of the class without notes.
I would love that!
I wouldn't mind. Some would struggle.
I taught a class of eight students who liked each other and got along well (but weren’t dating each other) for twenty hours a week for six weeks. They were all still terrified to give presentations at the end, even though it was a language course and they all already spoke a lot in class. I don’t know how I could make it easier for them, because that’s just about the lowest stress scenario I can set up. I’m not judging them for it, because I had a couple moments of panic in front of them as well, sometimes it happens, but I’d like to make it less stressful. I could just have them do it every day to make it routine, but if some of them are really affected by it, that might just make them dread the class.
Public speaking is a dying art, with the potential to change the world. People just aren't given enough exposure in the right circumstances anymore. All we need is a place where it's safe to fail, and all that nervous energy becomes a vibrant excitement with no comparison.
Though this doesn't seem like a valid application of TAS, I'll bite.
A calculator can do your math homework for you, but that doesn't mean the homework is useless. It means that if you don't follow the rules the work is useless. Just because something with no understanding can complete a task doesn't mean a human with no understanding can. It is built to test a human, not a computer, and it generally does so well enough provided the human is the one doing the work.
Yeah it's built to serve as practice and to leave you with the questions you need to ask the next day.
I get it. I hated homework in school and generally didn't do it. And a fair bit of it was busywork. But when I got to college I learned the hard way that if I didn't do my homework, I wouldn't really have the skills. It's easy to sit through classes daydreaming or even listening, and just not really understand how to do a thing.
Yeah but for real proof of understanding has always been a problem. One of the reasons generated text is so pernicious is because even in everyday life, it outwardly mimics all the signals of care and cognition.
To the main point: much smaller class sizes is how you solve this problem.
exams ... can be fooled by plausible-sounding bullshit
Maybe in the soft sciences, but try passing organic chem. 3 or chemical reactor design with plausible-sounding bullshit.
And even that doesn't matter: ChatGPT can pass a university-level physics exam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBtfwa-Fexc
Non scholae sed vitae discimus - a student who does their homework with LLMs has learned nothing.
Always has been...
I had Latin in school, and the teacher was a bit senile already. He started making the rounds to check our homework - which I had not done. So I just hastily scribbled some lines of gibberish into my notebook. He came to my place, looked at my notes, and scolded me for my bad writing. And signed it off as done...
i can tell you from experience that teachers are using it too lol, to create the homework
one of my university professors admitted that he used copilot to create some questions for our exams of that class 🙃
I tried it for my class, and the questions they come up with is boring, repetitive, and generic.
I feel very sorry for you that you need to endure that.
Would this be better than recycling the same 5yrs worth of material?
What's wrong with recycling material? If it's decent, it's still gonna be useful for a new class...
My students can use a translator for every interaction they have forever, or they can do the homework and try to learn the language. Three guesses as to what’s actually easier in the end. Just because it can be done by a computer doesn’t mean there’s no reason for a human to learn it.
How is anyone using ChatGPT in an exam? Surely exams are taken in controlled conditions?
Most of my exams have been online with no proctoring... Hell most of them are meant to be open note I think. That or my class just does a final project or paper rather than an exam. I've only had a few in person on paper final exams, and one online proctored exam where you have to scan your surroundings before testing.
I hate AI so I'd never use that to cheat (plus that shit is obvious and often wrong anyway), I just look at my own notes because I wrote them for a fucking reason. But like most of my exams or papers could've been done with AI I guess. Or like someone said go to the bathroom with your phone, as I've never had to hand over my phone before an in-person exam.
Honestly highschool was more serious about devices when I took state tests/finals and the ACT, they either took it or it had to be in a bag completely turned off, and if you did take a bathroom break (which was HIGHLY discouraged and I think only available during certain times), you had to hand over your phone.