all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Oh wow another overblown privilege escalation bug that REQUIRES pre-existing access to a machine in order to actually be used. If someone has enough access to my machines to execute this they already have likely pwned all the information they want without needing root at all..

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago

    It is a bit eye rolling "LOOK AT THIS DISASTER OF AN EXPLOIT!!!" *Requires physical access to the machine

    But the major issue is that if you have some other exploit that gets you RCE or a shell you can then use these exploits to pwn someone and we have RCE's and shell exploits come around all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    LPE is in the title. And you sound like someone who doesn't know what that stands for.

    This also comes with a good public write-up on github (not some monetized fancy domain), with an explanation why it went public early, which wasn't their fault.

    There is a lot of intelligence insulting going on in the security theater industry, which is something I talked about here more than once, despite not being exactly a prolific commentator. But unfortunately for you, this particular case is one of the least offensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Desktop machines aren't really the target of these kinds of attacks.

    Also I think the author in this case seems to have been pretty reasonable about what they did. If more of these issues were done this way I wouldn't have nearly as much irritation about "branded bugs."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    That may be true for private machines, but having user access to a machine, yet not be allowed admin rights is not actually a rare setup in the wild (read: servers... where the actual money is, not on that boring thing sitting under your desk)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I take it you didn't read it. It's a dry description of what the exploit is, how it works, how to make it happen, how to mitigate it

    It doesn't try to invoke worry or panic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    No fancy domain, I rate this 7/10

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Well this name was definitely a lesson to double check what you read from a post when just scrolling on by...

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Are there any real life scenarios where an untrusted user is allowed access to a machine with an unprivileged account? I know there are (or were?) some public shared machines where you can ssh in for fun, but those aren't serious.

    I'm thinking maybe a POS system or kiosk running Linux, and there's shell access? This could possibly also be useful for jailbreaking devices that ship with Linux, but are locked down... Maybe like a car infotainment system?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago

    Pretty much all those examples, but the real danger is chaining this exploit with others

    Perhaps someone is sitting on a couple exploits to get them into a system, but only to an unprivileged user, this would be a great final act

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)
    • 2026-05-07: Submitted detailed information about the vulnerability and the exploit to the linux-distros mailing list. The embargo was set to 5 days, with an agreement that if a third party publishes the exploit on the internet during the embargo period, the Dirty Frag exploit would be published publicly.
    • 2026-05-07: Detailed information and the exploit for this vulnerability were published publicly by an unrelated third party, breaking the embargo.

    Well, that's reassuring - hopefully, since the patch for it is also described in the repo, distro maintainers can patch it quickly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Update: Kernel 7.0.5 just released

    Fixes: cac2661c53f3 ("esp4: Avoid skb_cow_data whenever possible")

    Fixes: 03e2a30f6a27 ("esp6: Avoid skb_cow_data whenever possible")

    Fixes: 7da0dde68486 ("ip, udp: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES")

    Fixes: 6d8192bd69bb ("ip6, udp6: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES")

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Oh interesting I want to try it against my laptop, Fedora

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments