all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 4 months ago

Publish and perish!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    Every author named as writing a paper bears full responsibility for the paper.

    This has the nice added bonus that it will likely catch PI's that put their name on their grad students paper without actually doing the mentoring they were supposed to. It will also catch professors that coast (or at least inflate their citation index) by getting their name on papers they barely contributed to.

    I am quite convinced that, under these arxive guidelines, every single major PI in the field will be banned within a few years.

    Catching a lot of PIs that have allowed and even encouraged slop submission is a good thing in my book.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    fun fact: even vixra has had an anti ai paper policy for idk how long, at least ten months

    https://bsky.app/profile/scgriffith.bsky.social/post/3lsek4cpnpk2n

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    It's not quite clear to me that

    We rely on some standard LLM detectors to focus our attention on papers that need to be checked.

    implies they are using LLMs themselves. The phrase "LLM detector" is a bit ambiguous and could mean "LLM being used as a detector" or just "classifier program designed to detect LLM output".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Corey S. Powell:

    Imagine the staggering labor involved in sending around an email that says, "Nobody did anything dumb like using AI to generate the citations, right?" I mean, that could take seconds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments