this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
165 points (95.6% liked)

Games

39658 readers
1573 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I just hope the flaws have a much better reward than the first. The tradeoff never felt like they were worth it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

that's one of the things they underlined in the direct. they seem to be more interesting in general. klepto for example lets you sell things you've stolen for more money but every now and then you auto steal stuff you look at, which can get you in trouble.

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I know absolutely nothing about this game, except that anticapitalist song

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I always get extra disappointed by the Outer Worlds, because I always confuse it with the Outer Wilds and would rather play that game.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah shit. I swear to god, this just happened to me. I came to the comments, confused why a trailer for Outer Wilds 2 would be age-restricted.

Ugh.

But then again, you cleared up my confusion, so I guess there's that.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weird cause I have the exact opposite reaction. Could not get into Outer Wilds. Flying the ship was so annoying.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

On the one hand, the ship was one of the most fun parts for me, but on the other, I do wonder if it was a mistake because it makes the game so much more frustrating for anyone who hasn’t been trained on kerbal space program or some other Newtonian space control game to get the hang of it.

It’s like riding a bike, if you know how to do it you have trouble even imaging why it’s hard, but nobody can do it at first, and it takes ages to get the new instincts to actually enjoy it.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The ship was one of the best parts for sure. Once you are competent it feels super liberating how nimbly you can zip around a planet.

The other good parts of that game were progression, and death.

I love that knowledge is the only thing retained between loops - the only currency of value. And I loved the feeling of making new discoveries.

And with death as an expected mechanic, the game doesn't have to put up any guiderails to save you from it. There are no training wheels. You want to go outside without a spacesuit? Bad idea but we'll let you. You want to literally lose your ship so you can never get it back? Sure, go for it. You want to fall into a space anomaly and see what happens? Be our guest.

Masterpiece game honestly.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I vividly remember the first time I played Space Engineers crashing my first vehicle every time.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

I played them both and was disappointed by both. Didn't even bother finishing either of them.

Depression is a removed. :(

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was not super enamoured with 1. But most of my complaints were from features that just needed more time to cook.

Really hope they get addressed in 2. Would be an incredible game if so.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The story in 1 was also weak. When you've got shit like Disco Elysium out there, the pandering "ooh capitalism is big bad" while also not giving it a serious critique falls pretty flat.

The trailer for 2 even jokes about how its "by capitalism."

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While I agree with you, it's a bit unfair to compare the two.

DE is "just" a point and click pushed to an absurd level of quality, meaning that most of the production can go into managing a story.

OW is an fps, meaning you need a gameplay loop, weapons, balancing, environments, etc etc. It's also a dark satire, not a serious philosophical work like elysium. Reading 10 pages of text on the nature of violence before you get to shoot your gun would not work.

This doesn't excuse a weak story, but does explain how it's much more difficult and costly to fit one in there. (yes bioshock, but those games are the exception in fps games).

I would love a better story, with a tightly integrated story, that would be very difficult to pull off in the current game dev space at this scale.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna be real, with all the material to be inspired by, you dont really have to spend all that much to produce a great story. 1 had all the pieces there, it was just missing that little something that makes it great. It felt like a watered down Monty Python.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

That was my issue with the game too. The concept was good, but the game seemed rushed. You can literally see blank spaces in the map that were obviously supposed to have stuff there (like an extra companion quarters on your ship that was clearly walled off and deleted, for example). The sequel has potential to be great if they take their time on it.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] eronth@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Well, time and a sale it is, then.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

The Atari 2600 released for $190 in 1977. Or about $1000 today.

The best selling title, Pac-Man released for $28 in 1982. Or about $95 today.

Compared to so much else that has risen dramatically over time, vastly outpacing video games comparatively, I think it's a bit hard to argue with the value proposition of modern titles.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Games at that time were cutting edge technology, distribution networks didn't exist, physical units had to make it to stores, etc. The environment isn't the same. Don't get me wrong, I don't think $80 is terribly outrageous in our modern economy but at that price point it has better provide 60+ hours of entertainment. If outer worlds 2 is as good as #1 it's worth $40 tops. I played that game end to end and can't recall a single characters name.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I agree about everything in your first point. I hadn't previously considered that the novelty of a new technology would necessarily increase have disproportionately high initial cost.

That said, I feel like any calculation of cost against how many hours played is entirely subjective. Your suggestion of $0.75 / entertainment hour is quite different than what I consider ideal. Games will vary genre to genre, person to person, platform to platform.

A person with limited time might exclusively play shorter titles, or maybe just multiplayer titles. A person with significant free time might spent hundreds of hours replaying an RPG.

To be incredibly broad, I would say that games shouldn't cost more per entertainment hour than half of what any given person earns at their job - but even that is quite subjective and should be taken with salt.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hamburgers were 28 cents in 1977.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Too bad burgers outpaced inflation then. It'd be nice to have a $1.50 option commonly available.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Groceries are a small fortune

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welp, guess I can get this one on sale just like I did the first. This i spent maybe $15-$20 on it?

#PatientGamers

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yup, this is why the $80 price tag doesn't bother me. I've got a backlog of games I want to play that I probably already can't finish in my lifetime. This will be $20 a year post release and in two years that $20 will get you all the dlc as well.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yea. The only games I buy on release are fighting games, but that just because during the release window is some of the best fun you can have for the online multiplayer as a casual. After about the first month or so a meta gets established and then everyone online is just playing the same carbon copy of whatever the YouTube pros are doing.

Though these hands are getting old and I think this most recent release of fighters will be my last. Just can't keep up anymore.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I liked the first one but it was free with the 99 cent game pass. It was very short imo and I would have been pissed off I'd paid full price.

[–] don@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m a Spacer’s Choice man, myself. Everything else is just trustworthy and reliable.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“You’ve had the best, now try the rest.”

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

"It's not the best choice, it's Spacer's Choice"

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I absolutely loved Outer Worlds 1, can't wait for 2 :D

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I love Obsidian's factions!

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same. It was rough but damn it was good fun. I really hope they cleaned up the edges with two and full send it with that dark satire angle again. I want them to double down with the humor they cultivated for the in-game world.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

Very excited! I hope they increased the scope a little, as the first one felt just a little short. That said though, I loved what was there!

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Seems interesting enough. The first game was fun and I wonder what ending from game 1 is canon.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Better be game of the year for 80.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Damn aunty Cleo. What a removed. lol.

[–] noname_yet2077@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Oh no... (Hope they don't f it up)