this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

TechTakes

2586 readers
97 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

STOP FINDING THINGS

  • WEB PAGES WERE NOT MEANT TO BE FOUND
  • YEARS OF SEARCHING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for PAGES of SEO-OPTIMISED AI SLOP
  • Wanted to find things anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: it was called WIKIPEDIA "RANDOM PAGE"
  • "Yes please give me ONE HUNDRED AND TEN MILLION of my search. Please give me TEN ADS and A PARAGRAPH OF SLOP FIRST" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Search engines have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the ad views we gave them

(This is REAL Search results, given by REAL search engines)

  • "None of Africa's 54 recognized countries start with the letter 'K'."
  • "Add about 1/8 cup of non-toxic glue to the sauce"
  • "Understood. No more templates—just direct answers, hyper-focused on exactly what you need."

"Hello Something went wrong and an AI response wasn't generated"

They have played us for absolute fools

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Spring is in the air, and someone presenting themselves as interested in fucking rationalist males has authored a piece about how said men can dress a bit better and maybe, just maybe, get laid:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vHtouRBd8JNm2tNLH/basic-principles-for-dressing-better

as usual, the real comedy is in the comments

  • I dress like a schlub specifically to avoid advertising my sexual availability - https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vHtouRBd8JNm2tNLH/basic-principles-for-dressing-better?commentId=RLdXtcStz9wdAvb4d
  • "The item that I currently wear that expresses the most about me is my Oura ring followed by barefoot shoes." - strangely not the same as the commenter above
  • "When it comes to slim fit jeans I have the impression that fashion changed. Five years ago they were seen as great and now they don't? Is that accurate?"
  • "Overall, I think it makes the most sense to go to the pareto frontier here. You can spend 300-400 total getting some nice looking earth tone button-ups, well-fitting pants that aren't blue jeans, trim your beard, get regular haircuts from an actual salon, shower daily, and make sure you smell decent."
  • "[...] when I look at the examples, what occurs to me is that dressing like the example would cause me to stick out and make it obvious to others I am making a special effort, and I'd rather not do that."
  • "I was hoping for more fashion theory; the why. "
  • "It is fascinating to receive such communiqués of strange news from another star. I would not know, without your saying so, that the set of 10 pictures are intended to be good examples and not bad examples."
  • "[...] it is far more important that whatever my spouse wears be a pleasant texture to put my face on, most buttondown material fails this criterion but linen passes" - actually this is just cute
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

“It is fascinating to receive such communiqués of strange news from another star. I would not know, without your saying so, that the set of 10 pictures are intended to be good examples and not bad examples.”

To be fair most of said outfits read as “rich arsehole” to me, which I do not find attractive. Yellow shirt guy I would suspect to be a white supremacist.

As far as men’s fashion goes, I’ve seen much worse, though the bits I do like here feel fairly gay-coded to me so uh whatever. (I suspect those are the very same bits our Lesswrong Commenter is disapproving of.)

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TO BE CLEAR I am not advocating for nerd fashion I’m just working class

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

You know, “most of said outfits” was too harsh. I’m gonna rate the outfits now, I love rating outfits!!!

2, 3 and 10 look like men you should run away from.

6 looks like he’s cosplaying as 60s italian movie riviera pinterest europe cinecitta, which I instinctively distrust. And I don’t care what anyone says, I will simply not abide the sockless loafer.

4, whatever. I do not want to talk him. We clearly have nothing in common.

8 is awesome. Looks like an actual cool guy, lovely outfit, love the pose. He’s what 6 wants to be.

7 is pretty cool too. Have to dock points for the very modelly pose, sadly, but still, pretty sick fit.

5 I don’t really like but he’s a more confidently realised version of 6 so good for him. Not tryhard or heterosexual-looking enough for me to hate. Keep it up.

9 I am sure I would absolutely love if I saw it on someone who didn’t look like they were fresh out the male model factory. Bonus points for uncreased trousers.

And finally 1 is obviously awesome but like. You cannot use this as an outfit recommendation. That’s just irresponsible. First the guy is buff as fuck and that is a necessary part of the outfit. It’s all about that mad silhouette. Second, I mean. This is pretty eccentric right. If you saw everyone dressing like this it would just be dumb. You cannot expect those poor lesswrongs to understand this.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

3 and 10 look like the overconfident, amateurish poser villains whom Dr. Lecter kills by the end of the episode.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago

Well now you've made me look at the image too long, too.

#1's belt probably wraps twice around that waistline, I'd say photoshop/AI but there's that 1/3 of the shirt hanging off to the right with nothing to fill it so yeah, and also Phil Davis^1^ exists.

#10 is aspiring to be the jock from scooby doo and I don't think that jacket can actually close, similarly to #1 the whole thing probably only works for very specific poses and angles.

#6 looks like he runs a leopard print handbag delivery service, #4 is horny youth pastor in his aunt's kitchen, 7-9 look comfy but contrived, #5 really wants you to know he's wearing a possibly expensive wife beater under that shirt and 2 & 3 are all sorts of dodgy, esp. #3 who looks like a tourist trap gift shop keeper whose face is noticeably untanned because he has to hide it a lot for undisclosed reasons.

#2 mostly has a raging case of resting netflix true crime serial killer face syndrome.

I get that the point probably was to only show the broad strokes of how it should look if you're making an effort, but whatever.

1Phil Davis

[–] aio@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

serial killer
serial killer
serial killer
serial killer
serial killer
serial killer
serial killer
cool guy
serial killer
serial killer

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You can lead a horse to water but you can't prevent it from Bayesing out.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If, like some of my male housemates you object on principle to the concept of a bag

then you need to watch Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade again. From there, you can graduate to the Tom Holland "Umbrella" video, which is clinically proven to make cis het women ovulate.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago

And also, like, laptop bags exist? They come in basic black. You can use them for books, emergency chocolate, manila envelopes stuffed with students' homework that you need to grade... I bought one at a camping-goods store, and it's lasted about 20 years.

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

SpaceX has chosen a ~~sacrificial~~ ~~disposable~~ ~~naive~~ crypto billionaire to captain a mars fly-by someday: https://gizmodo.com/spacex-taps-crypto-billionaire-to-lead-first-crewed-mission-to-mars-2000762451

The mission is expected to take two years and here's what he has to say about that:

I can stare at the map view on airplanes all the way from takeoff to landing, so I think I will enjoy the trip.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can stare at the map view on airplanes all the way from takeoff to landing, so I think I will enjoy the trip.

Well they do tend to think stuff scales forever.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

can't wait for the inevitable livestreamed freakout/cannibalism scene

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 8 points 6 days ago

He already pulled the same con on a Japanese billionaire in 2018, just talked about flying around the moon not landing on Mars (Wikipedia: dearMoon)

[–] aninjury2all@awful.systems 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

As always with these people, note that the replies make frequent reference to "loopholes" and people "exploiting the system" without ever being specific about what those loopholes are.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The number of bitter fascist weirdos kicking Beff (of all people) while he's down sure is something.

No honor among thieves i reckon.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago

Isnt part of the fasc idea space the whole idea that the strong are worthy and would be rewarded and rise to the top the world just got away of all the rules pushing the unworthy? Clearly this means that as he is in trouble he is unworthy himself and now a target.

Esp as you can get a social boost by stepping on him on your way up.

The loneliest ideology.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know Guillaume Verdon / Beff Jezos but Forbes' profile begins:

Andreessen Horowitz cofounder Marc Andreessen says @BasedBeffJezos is a “patron saint of techno-optimism.” Garry Tan, who cofounded the venture firm Initialized Capital before becoming CEO of Y Combinator, calls him “brother.” Sam Altman, who founded OpenAI — the company that finally mainstreamed artificial intelligence — has jokingly sparred with him on Twitter. Elon Musk says his memes are “🔥🔥🔥.”

He has an entry on the Effective Accelerationism wiki https://www.eaccwiki.com/index.php?title=Beff_Jezos

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don’t know Guillaume Verdon / Beff Jezos

He is supposed to be the original instigator and public face of so-called e/acc or effective accelarationism, i.e. the rationalist (or maybe rationalist inspired idk) spin-off of people who feel whinging about alignment isn't necessary and that it's in fact awesome when new technology is killing people and ruining the environment because it means we're getting to the singularity faster, and also openly rooting for fascism on main is based now.

His magic heatless AI processor startup feels like a grift to fleece investors and as far as I know has only ever produced an obviously staged video of sciency looking individuals fawning over a 3d printed wire mesh while touring what looks like a chip fab with an extremely lax contamination protocol.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago

🎶 sing us a song you're the nano man 🎶

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

xheet is deleted, was is Beff Jezoz who wrote that? background? though he was as American as ~~apple pie~~the Ku Klux Klan

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Forbes says he is Quebecois with a PhD from UWaterloo. That does not stop him tweeting about "foreigners" (= foreign to the USA, but not including him obviously).

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago

I'm sure he'll enjoy being deported back to la République populaire démocratique de Quebec and spending a short time in the reeducations camps before being set to work installing solar panels

[–] aninjury2all@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago

URL Typo - fixed it

[–] sansruse@awful.systems 2 points 4 days ago

in which our dearest friend DHH has become an unpaid shill for the novel Camp of the Saints

https://xcancel.com/dhh/status/2046982319353778391

nevertheless, the finest minds at hackernews and elsewhere have assured me that he's just a normal, sensible center right kind of guy! nothing untoward going on here, i advise every boutique computer manufacturer known to man to financially support him and his hyprland reskin wankfest.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

FTX investor the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan is a major investor in SpaceX. This seems to be part of the Teachers’ Innovation Platform from April 2019. Mr. Kipling said it best:

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire.

Meanwhile the Canadian stock market is up 40% in the past 1 year.

[–] maol@awful.systems 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also how would anybody be left behind? Lile say we are wrong an the AI stuff is real vital etc etc bla bla bla. Them we just need to learn a new tool.

Nobody died because they didnt want to learn how to use a debugger for several years and then finally reversed their stance.

[–] maol@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I guess the idea is that the tech economy moves fast and if we don't get to grips with AI we'll be left in the dust, broke and unemployed. Somehow this is proof that AI is good instead of proof the economy is bad (if people are impoverished in a whim). It's just the same self-satisfied fantasy as always.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago

Yes im just trying to say that it doesnt seem like a hard skill to pick up, and a skill which you can just skip a few generations and still be fine. Prompting gpt 1 is gonna ve different than the later models. (Even of the actual model improvements (compared to modules they add to the models) has drastically slowed down). Hell if AI worked you wouldn't even need the skills you could just ask AI whatever and it would figure it out.

[–] maol@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Here is a video of Eric Schmidt getting loudly booed at a commencement speech

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5MYggR_PPRg

https://www.youtube.com/live/b1eM3jv0vWY?t=7923

It is an impressively bad speech.

[–] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I find it really funny how after he gets booed he says, "If you don't care about science, that's okay, because AI is going to touch everything else as well. Whatever path you choose, AI will become part of how work is done." Yeah, if you're worried that AI is only going to fuck up science, don't worry, it's going to fuck up everything else as well. Was he trying to stick to a (terrible) script, or is he genuinely this incapable of reading a room?

"When someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat. You just get on." No, my mom taught me about stranger danger. I know what to do when a sketchy old man named Eric Schmidt pulls up with a rocket ship that says FREE ICE CREAM.

"The rocket ship is here. Let me give you some advice. First, find a way to say yes. Listen." Thanks for revealing how AI adoption is really about coercion. It doesn't matter what you think, AI is inevitable and you ignorant Luddites are gonna have to find a way to like it.

Truly a masterclass in public speaking by Eric Schmidt. When the audience reacts negatively to what you said, just double down and shove it down their throats. You're a billionaire, so you know better than them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Ask HN: Company is rapidly cutting AI tool spend how to prep team?

Company I work for is now rapidly planning to scale down its AI tooling spend. Claude code access is basically getting removed and people are forbidden from using personal plans. Reasoning is cost apparently our monthly Claude bill has become astronomical for the org. Nearly 3x our saas's cloud spend.

Apparently we are going to get limited access to codex at severely reduced plans.

I have tried some local models such as Kimi, however most are barely functional.

I am very concerned as the expectation of amount of work done is to remain consistent. Ignoring the fact teams have made entire workflows around Claude I am very worried and frustrated.

How can I help my team ease this transition? Are their local models that run well on local machines that only have 16gb ram?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189073

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] lurker@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

AI CEOs Baffled by Hatred of Their Technology

"Why do people hate us so much? We only constantly say the technology we're making is dangerous and then block regulation, suck up resources, commit mass theft and plagiarism, threatened to destabilise the economy, enabled more CSAM, caused widespread mental health issues and multiple suicides, unleashed a barrage of slop, engaged in mass surveillance and mocked people against the tech? Don't they know AI is the future and will create a utopia where we all live in a simulation in space?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Despite the promise of being uploaded to the computer would free men from the shackles of the flesh, LW still finds time to debate the fine points of what makes a woman want to fuck a man:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/w3y9G4ybNb3rmTgev/why-physical-attractiveness-matters-for-men-s-dating

A month ago, I went to a sex club for the first time. One big thing I noticed: the classic “your eyes meet” trope absolutely did not happen at that club. And I don’t just mean it didn’t happen to me - every single woman there avoided meeting the eyes of anyone.

gee I wonder why

The promise of physical attractiveness, for men, is that you can pay an upfront cost to get in good shape, dress well, etc. You do it basically once. And then, connecting with new women doesn’t take an enormous amount of time. And you don’t need the absolutely miserable skill of trying to build attraction from scratch. [...] It’s all about making that very first contact easier, because the very first contact is the biggest pain point for guys.

hear me out here, this is just off the top of my head, how about treating women like human beings instead of mysterious creatures who must be seduced into liking you

1 comment, essentially saying if you're not above average height you might as well die alone

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›