all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 4 months ago (21 children)

FYI in standard English it would be "spatial" not "spacial", for yet another edition of "the English language has lots of silly rules and spellings that don't always match up"

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    With all respect im not sure you are right or that it matters, fwiw im not actively learning english, im pretty sick at it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (18 children)

    I'm a native English speaker and spatial is correct.

    "Spacial" is a misspelling that became oddly popular for some in AR and VR, but it is absolutely a misspelling of spatial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    I would be considered also a "native" english speaker, and i do not like this dictionary adherant approach to speech, who holds the truth?, it is everhwhere, now you can make an argument that I should use spatial which would have some sense to it, but i am not "wrong"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (16 children)

    Common use is what holds the truth, or people will have trouble understanding what you've written, which had already happened in this post.

    If you dont want anyone to understand, go for it I guess, good luck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] [S] -7 points 4 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    To be fair I am ancient and loved spatial cause it reminds me of spatula but it’s for space. So I didn’t know spacial and looked it up and was confused why it was all techbro companies lol, till I came to the comments

    Not to stop you from living your life, but I do want to highlight spatial does have legs to stand on (vis-à-via previously mentioned spatula connection that likely only I have made)

    (Also my first guess for spacial was a facial in space, dealer’s choice on the type of facial I suppose)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    "Alternative spelling of spatial. "

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    So... What I already said?

    Cool.

    Sorry you're so mad about my offer to help with spelling. Dont worry, I've already tagged you so I won't bother with you again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    What!, you are just saying i should use american over british english standards and telling me im wrong because of it, not that the only split possible is american/ british, actually learn some respect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    British English would also be spatial, actually. Spacial is only an alternative in American English, for the reasons I already mentioned - some specific circles of AR and VR.

    It comes from the Latin spatium.

    The first use of "spatial" comes from the UK.

    Enjoy your day, I'll not bother replying to you again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    Can you explain to me what "spacial db-s" means?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    spacial database, i used postgres and postGIS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    Oh okay, the dash had me confused.

    What are you using it for, exactly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    It is for dealing with 2 and 3d data in a database, so one can create views upon data that are calculated by use of geometric functions for example

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds interesting! So everything we see in these pictures has been calculated from spacial information taken from a "regular" relational database?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago

    yep so it is all still tables, and they contain abstractions like lines and vectors, its nothing new over a tuple over maybe worsening the generality of general data structures, or improving computational efficiency. Then you get some functions to join it all together into new perspectives This was all done on gnu guix with postgres, postGIS and the visualisation software

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    I was not using it, this was mandated by a university course which i only did at the mandate of immigration pigs because the better one fell through

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure I understand that right, can you explain? Does this have something to do with ICE? Who fell through what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago

    I mean that national ideologues enforce conceptions of foreigners who must dance a little dance for 5 or more years, and part of that is "studying", so when a course i was to do was cancelled i had to choose a chumpy backup

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Spacial databases? Some kind of AI slop thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Everything is rough guesses from what I could remember:

    Arrable land:

    Capacity of buildings ( maybe person density i dont remember):

    Footfall:

    Complete model:

    Satalite image:

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Proč to zrcadlení? (Why the horizontal flip?)

    Edit: I speak Czech and don't get the answer either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments