all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 3 months ago

Protectionism for the US auto industry as usual.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Sad, but not surprising

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Are we to believe that Polestar cars are the only ones with "Chinese-linked vehicle technology"?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    From outside, guessing a lack of “US-linked vehicle technology” is the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    And then those parts would be tariffed until non-viable for the same reason this was blocked and chinese evs are tariffed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago*

    Tariffs are country-specific, they can just say "electric batteries are tariffed 125% if they're made in China, and also if we say your factory is "linked to china"", which is what they already do. Or they can just say "lol your not allowed to even build them here" as they did in op.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's not a hardware issue at all. These cars are manufactured in the U.S. already, in South Carolina. The problem is the belief that the software allows for privacy violations under the control of the Chinese government.

    Personally, I'd just prefer a privacy-enforcing system that applies equally to all manufacturers regardless of nationality, and apply these standards to everyone, but that's not really politically in the cards these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment