his comics are great. i enjoyed the full page of short format comics: https://www.peppercarrot.com/en/webcomics/peppercarrot.html
first impressions give a strong ai vibe, but he makes a good case that ai looks like his work instead indeed
his comics are great. i enjoyed the full page of short format comics: https://www.peppercarrot.com/en/webcomics/peppercarrot.html
first impressions give a strong ai vibe, but he makes a good case that ai looks like his work instead indeed
I fucking hate social networks for this exactly, the 80% of the users are just lazy motherfuckers who do not do anything for their lifes but comment shit, their life force is literally criticize others while being such useless pieces of shit
Must be frustrating. I've been following him since he was making tutorials using alchemy and mypaint around 2010, so I've seen his style coalesce. I can understand the commenters' suspicion, it just kinda sucks that some of the most common AI styles landed so close to his..
Is the yellow tint in the strip him deliberately trying to make some sort of point, or is it always like that?
I saw comments on his Fediverse post of the comic indicating it may be that "golden sunlight" shading idea of adding warmth. It's much flatter of an effect in generated images than in his art, I think, where sometimes it's heavy and sometimes light and not even always present.
I hadn't noticed it, but the whole style is petty similar to a lot of his recent work, so I guess it's not a deliberate point.
"Everybody wants to be a sleuth" or something, analog to "everyone's a critic".
I wish it was limited to visual artists; just a few minutes ago I read a lengthy & well-written comment right here in the fediverse, to which someone replied "they shouldn't have used AI to write it". Somehow completely ignoring the actual content.
This has been going on for a while. Partially because AI-generated imagery was really bad just a couple of years ago, so people feel competent, otoh it gets harder to detect, which is a challenge... not sure where I'm going with this, but I have a feeling that this is an aspect of human behavior that manifests in other regards, too, and has forever. And that I believe it will pass, although the downside might be that artists will start to create things that deliberately do not look "like they're AI".

I get it though, the state of everything right now really really sucks. When I enjoy content that I later find to be AI generated, I feel like I've been deceived or manipulated and it has me doubting the authenticity of pretty much everything to avoid feeling that way.
I don't know what the solution would be to it at this point either
artists will start to create things that deliberately do not look “like they’re AI”.
Arguably though this is how new art styles are often created. What is the current safe, trendy art gets challenged. Andy Worhol painted a grid of Campbell's tomato soup cans which is considered an important piece of American Modern Art. I'm certainly not saying "an upside to AI is that it will force artists to be more creative" or anything like that, moreso that as you said, a pattern of artists rebelling against the norm is a historical cycle rather than something new AI will bring on.
It will always be an arms race. If someone develops a new style that doesn't look like AI, then it's only a matter of time before an AI model can generate that style.
And the future I see for this arms race is eventually it will be better than humans at producing art that doesn't look like AI.
I'm at the point where I think AI generated shit should be judged on its own merit rather than for whether or not it's AI because eventually we won't be able to tell from other factors and any attempts will end up hurting humans more than the AIs (because they have no feelings to be hurt and will just continue while some portion of the humans will get discouraged and stop bothering to try).
Plus, at least with programming, saying code sucks because it's AI generated is weak. If a code submission is shit, there will be technical reasons that it is shit that have nothing to do with who (or what) wrote it.
Feel similar to NothingEverHappens, now we get EverythinIsAI. That fucking garbage just further erodes trust.
The first time I saw one of his comics I really thought it was AI as well. The yellow tint was part of it, but I think another part is the background and foreground not matching. Another thing that stood out was just the amount of detail, felt way more effort than most web comics.
It really is too bad for the artists, he clearly puts a ton of work into these, and it no doubt hurts to have others undercut that.
I'm afraid to say I did too and it wasn't until I saw his time-lapse that I was fully convinced. I think it's the soft, studio ghibli like style. One of the chat GPT models was spruiking it a year or so ago and everybody was posting 'Ghiblified' profile pics so now it's kind of synonymous with low effort AI art (which is such a shame).
A lot of people are dumb as hell, and it really shines through every time humanity comes up with something new, good or bad.
David has been drawing the Pepper and Carrot webcomic for well over a decade now and his style has been pretty consistent.
He makes them all in Krita as well.
I blame the image generators more than the people. If they didn't exist, nobody would be blaming the artist for anything.
There are probably artists thinking "I don't wanna post my art online cause what if they call it fake or use it to train" too nowadays.
Alternatively, we could change social traditions to one where it's normal to go "Well artist's credit is there, I will investigate real quick." But that's for later.
Relevant David Revoy cartoon: https://thebrainbin.org/m/comicstrips@lemmy.world/t/1848750/authenticity-problem
Pro tip: when copying a link to a Lemmy/Piefed/Kbin/etc post, please make sure you use your instance's option to copy the link to the post on its original instance (the instance the post was made on), rather than simply copying the link to the post on your instance out of your URL bar. On your instance's web interface, that option is in the More drop down next to the Boost button, just below the post title. (On a Lemmy instance, the link to the original post is the Fediverse icon right next to the upvote and downvote buttons, and you can right click and Copy Link from there).
Obviously, when you open a post in the browser on an instance that isn't yours by clicking a link (for example, this link to this same post on my instance, which is a vanilla Lemmy instance), you can't interact with it, because you aren't logged in, because you don't have an account on that instance. To interact with it, you need to open the same post through your own instance.
If you have a link to a post on the instance it was created on, you can simply paste that URL (the whole thing) into your instance's search bar to open it on there, so you can vote/comment/etc. Some mobile apps can even do this automatically. However, this doesn't work if you paste a link to a post through an instance other than the instance it was created on. In order to interact with the post you just linked to, people have to click the link to open the post on your instance, then click the button on there to copy the original link, before pasting it into their own instance. It's polite not to make them go through that extra work.
Judging by your account age, it seems you're new to Lemmy, so you probably didn't know that. Just something to keep in mind for future. :)
Can someone explain what an open source comic artist is?
Not only are his comics CC, his entire artistic workflow is built on FOSS. His art tablet runs Linux, he uses Krita for digital painting, his fonts and brushes are FOSS too, and he provides them free of charge for anybody to download.
He also provides free tutorials and guides on his setup and workflow, and advice one how to start using FOSS as a professional artist.
His comic is open source. Might seem like a moot point seeing as how most comics can be seen on the web for free but it lets people use it for other stuff. From what I understand, a few of his comics have been turned into short animations and things like that. Kind of cool tbh.
top 50 comments