cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46376556

What a way to indoctrinate the mass public by proclaiming that AI is ‘for all’.

Hey, if AI is for all, here‘s a suggestion: stop putting AI models up behind a paywall or subscription.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Read that again, giving ChatGPT 'unlimited access to free users'.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Gonna go ahead and guess that they will still have at least one model behind some sort of paywall/subscription?

    The thing about these companies is, whenever they bring out a ‘new, innovative’ AI, they tend to just pawn off the old models for free, knowing full well that it’s shit in comparison. In other words: they charge you for the ‘good’ stuff whilst taking a shit on you. And somehow, they’ve framed it as an amazing thing… and people eat it up like cereal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    This is for their IPO.

    Gotta hype and pump.

    ...And FYI, the spectacular drop after the IPO will be coming out of y'all's retirement accounts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They can't even afford their current paying user base... Aren't they months from insolvency at their burn rate?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That can't be good for their already worrisome finances

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    That’s sort of what they did? Luna seems to be mostly on par with gpt-5.4, which was SOTA half a year ago

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    With one model, yes, but why not all models if they’re serious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They're not serious, but also, this doesn't seem like a viable economic structure. More like they're trying to pump user numbers while losing even more annually than they already are in some last-ditch push to get the last out of their investors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Really have to be desperate for Puerto use their slop if they are doing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Altman is full of shit Everything he says is a lie.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    DeepSeek just released a model that is much cheaper to run and performs just as well as most GPT and Claude models. This is their reaction to try limit the damage from DeepSeek.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Trying so hard to get people dependent on their AI so they will pay for it later.

  • source