Seven US Navy personnel have reportedly been killed and several others wounded in a violent clash aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, as growing unrest among the carrier’s crew has exposed mounting pressure inside the US military amid a prolonged deployment.

The incident erupted after an adviser to US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Brad Cooper boarded the carrier to address mounting complaints from crew members following protests by their families over the ship’s prolonged deployment, according to Tasnim News Agency, citing an informed military source.

The adviser was reportedly met with boos and had water bottles thrown at him while addressing a gathering of personnel.

The confrontation subsequently escalated into a fight among crew members involving knives and other bladed weapons, leaving seven personnel dead and several others wounded, according to the source.

The atmosphere aboard the carrier remains tense and unsettled, Tasnim reported.

The Abraham Lincoln has been deployed for 263 days and is currently operating in the Indian Ocean, where its primary mission is to enforce an illegal naval blockade against Iran.

The carrier has spent 208 consecutive days at sea, the longest continuous deployment of any US aircraft carrier in the modern era, apart from a brief stop in Oman in July.

The reported violence comes amid growing concerns over the living and working conditions facing the roughly 5,000 sailors and Marines aboard the carrier.

Personnel have reportedly protested inadequate food supplies, with meals reduced to as little as half a cup of rice and two pieces of meat. The carrier’s laundry facilities have also been out of service for two weeks, while mold in shower areas has caused fungal infections among crew members.

Military families have raised concerns about exhaustion, mental health and the impact of the prolonged operational tempo on the crew’s ability to safely perform their duties.

At a meeting in San Diego on Thursday, around 200 relatives confronted acting US Navy Secretary Hung Cao over conditions aboard the carrier and the lack of a clear date for the crew’s return home.

The reported deaths aboard the Abraham Lincoln follow another serious incident involving the USS Gerald R. Ford. On March 12, 2026, a fire broke out in living quarters housing around 600 crew members, leaving 200 personnel injured.

The Gerald R. Ford subsequently took the injured to a naval facility on the Greek island of Crete before being forced to return to the United States.

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This part:

Personnel have reportedly protested inadequate food supplies, with meals reduced to as little as half a cup of rice and two pieces of meat. The carrier’s laundry facilities have also been out of service for two weeks, while mold in shower areas has caused fungal infections among crew members.

Explains the violence. It's kinda stunning to me. It feels like it shouldn't surprise me, considering how the US tends to behave, historically. But like, this is a level of unsustainable that is so evident, you can see it from space and they're just... they send a guy to go address the complaints with words??? Does the US have anyone left in charge who can think past the next financial quarter? Or are they all cowed by Trump and because he can't think past the next happy meal, they just have to shovel his unsustainable whims?

I guess I am still learning what imperial "decline" means, as an existing phenomenon.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Late Roman empire legionnaires were routinely abandoned in their garrisons, the increasingly dysfunctional Roman state unable to pay or continue organizing the logistics to supply them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Are you aware of the march of Rome by the general Sulla?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Sure. Not sure it's comparable though. The late Republic had political issues, but militarily and economically it was still pretty functional, and the social contract had not broken down yet. I'm talking late Empire, 3rd, 4th, 5th centuries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wow, this seems like a step on the way toward mutiny. Maybe it's wishful thinking but if they're willing to use violence, it's only a matter of number of sailors willing to use it before it becomes a real threat.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    Absolutely wild shit, those people are not happy.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago

    Tehran syndrome raygun doing Allah's work, Subhanallah.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    "A fight among crew."

    They told the lapdogs to kill some of the complainers to set an example, and labeled it as a brawl. (imo)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    holy shit that is awesome... let them cook!

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago

    Only a matter of time before the crew recites the shahada and asks Iran for asylum.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    We go now to Hung Cao for commentary on the shipboard menu:

    “What we need is alpha males and alpha females who are going to rip out their own guts, eat them and ask for seconds. Those are young men and women that are gonna win wars.”

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-debate-military-recruits-guts-hung-cao-virginia-senate-b2623383.html

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago

    being deployed to fight against foreigners in a war you didn't ask

    always fearing to die by iranian missiles

    die by a knife wound on board in hands of a crew member of your own country

    ironic

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago
    [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    USS Lincoln in its Potemkin Era

    love to see it

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    how did the iranian press discover this?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    Lmao womp womp

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    What if they're extending their deployment so that those onboard don't flee the navy and start ratting out the awesome working conditions?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Has this been reported on by any western sources?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Now, the guardian published this -> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/12/uss-abraham-lincoln-overboard-extended-deployment

    The Navy Times gave details of thwarted suicide attempts onboard the aircraft carrier during the current deployment. Annabelle Loma told the outlet that her husband had tried to jump overboard after his spell at sea kept being extended.

    Wonder if the aim of western media is to say that there are suicides.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    I wish there was information on how the violence was directed. It is presented as if low ranking crew members just started scrapping with each other but I can't understand why a brawl like this would start unless there was some severe factionalism among them. Wouldn't it make more sense for violence to be directed at command? Especially considering it was started in response to the boarding of a military advisor.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Was just wondering who the casualties were. I really hope it wasn't just 7 unlucky crewmembers and that they ended up getting some of the higher ups on board, but I feel if they killed their commanders that news would have spread way faster?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment