top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 125 points 1 month ago (18 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    They probably have a machine that trawls the internet for mentions of itself, then extracts the IP of whoever posted them, builds a profile on their entire web activity, links it to all the personally identifiable information that can be found on them online, then hacks into their devices and starts recording them through their own camera, mic, wifi, etc., and possibly mails them a brand new pager with custom modifications.

    So yeah, can't really blame the OOP for censoring the acronym...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Also more ethical than most US police departments.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Really? We have to censor IDF now?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 37 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It was already like this when I found it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 57 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Predators are warriors. The IDF and current Israeli administration is pretty fundamentally driven by fear.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Can't tell from the censor—does it say IDF or US police officer when dealing black children?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 1 month ago

    Uncensor that shit asap

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Predator would have to murder them, their mother, their relatives, and then take photos in the mother's lingerie to be the kind of asshole we've seen posted online.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    IDF sees a child and shoots. The gun is not necessary

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Well not surprised IDF thinks children pose a threat. You have to be a special type of coward to kill children.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm at a crossroads. I want to upvote for the message, but the self-censorship text scribbles can fuck right off.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    You'll see them respond two ways. Either they will argue a child can pull a trigger the same as an adult or that a child today is a soldier tomorrow. Ultimately they see them like any perpetrator of any genocide sees their victim, as a disease. Mental separation is really the only way people can cause harm to one another. We don't kill father's with children in war, we kill the enemy. The language around every genocide essentially revolves around the other group being a disease. They aren't men, women, and children, they are rats or cockroaches or something to that effect.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    FYI the phenomenon is called dehumanization

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    But many in the IDF are the type of predators who target children.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Many of us noticed that detail at the time, but it's important to bring it up whenever we deal with inhumane fuckfaces.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    this belongs in Lemmy Noshitsherlockpost

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Was that ever in question? Yautja care about honor.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    Omg this isn't a shitpost wtf

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Is this a shit post? Like it made me chuckle and it's political. Either way GJ

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›