Just feed it to an AI, that makes it OK. I think having a local speech model on your phone in the same room with you while watching should be sufficient.
post
I mean it’s OK - you’re not copying it, you’re using it to train an intelligence.
Yes, my own personal human intelligence. I promise training it will bring value to me and the community.
Even better: Your advancement is critical to ensure the American intelligence industry doesn’t fall behind.
it will bring value to [...] the community.
I'm inclined to find this more believable than similiar statements of all the usual AI suspects.
I just need a few more billion and it'll become profitable, I swear.
The Jellyfin instance, which normally just plays Ubuntu and other distro ISOs, of course.
I too stream Linux ISOs via my Jellyfin. My family enjoys it as well.
DVD/Blu-Ray rips are legal in some countries if you don't distribute them
You can also have open-source songs like the GNU/hackers one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw
There is only one song though.
It's just a copy. The original still exists somewhere. That's not stealing.
Reverse Sony logic.
Warning! ⚠️ do not consume!
See the real loophole is that I have de-registered myself as a conscious observer. In the eyes of the government, I have never seen a movie, or watched a TV show, or listened to an album.
I hope this is not against rules 4 and 6, but... I fear it might be?
If you want me to remove the post just tell me (or report it to the mods, of course).
I'm only sharing this because I found it very funny :)
It is fun of course, or people don't have a sense of humor.
Comment removed.
Edit: I was supporting OP .. but I am too tired to explain it
Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn
@talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world you have the genes of IE6
Does that person explain what exactly they mean by "breaking confinement" resp "escaping sandboxing" and how it happened?
edit: I clicked the link now and there is no explanation. I'm not sure they're even serious. I think this is some kind of netizen dada.
end-users are rarely prosecuted or sued over piracy so idk why corporations wouldn't get the same deal.
this is a big nothingburger if you wanna be honest.
piracy is much like drugs, where the occasional dealer gets nabbed if they're too ostentatious but otherwise things just go on and on and on and on.
end-users are rarely prosecuted or sued over piracy
That wasn't always true. The RIAA sued many people over music downloads (via bittorent since they're technically hosting at the same time as downloading). They only stopped once the major studios figured out it would cost less to force the ISPs to do it for them.
Because corporations aren't pirating for personzl consumption, they are pirating to ingest huge amounts of data for commercial use.
I can't tell whether you're kidding or not.
In Germany you absolutely get subpoenaed for the slightest copyright infringement. There a law firm called "Waldorf Frommer" that does all the dirty work for the so called rights holders.
Because corporations are repackaging the content and selling it, a big distinction you missed Mr. McNothingburger.
all 41 comments