1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Osama, easy. He's a family man and would show absolute respect and kindness towards the child as is the custom of his religion and his culture.
He has nothing against children and has a big household with other kids mine can play with.
My child will also be damn safe there and get great food.
Such an easy contest.
But would they be safe from US bombs?
I do not know the two others, but of course neither Hittler nor Ben Laden. Who are the two others?
Osama for sure.
Osama bin Laden cuz I work with the CIA too.
TIL that Hitler isn't the "Worst" option for everything lol
Depends on how white you are I guess.
I think im going bin laden
Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.
He went untouched for almost four decades I think they'd all be fine...
Top left: Lindsay Clancy - Apparently strangled her 3 kids, there is an ongoing process in the US right now
Top right: Osama Bin Laden - Former boss of the Taliban in Afghanistan and responsible for 9/11
Bottom left: Adolf Hitler - Leader of the German NSDAP and responsible for the Holocaust and WW2
Bottom right: Sean Combs aka P. Diddy - US musician, multiple cases of sexual violence and rape, and proliferation of prostitution
Thanks ChatGPT!
This is a pretty bold take from you. I don't need GenAI to know who Hitler and Bin Laden are, but I googled the woman and P. Diddy as I am not from the US. I cannot tell if the news sites I googled are LLM generated though. I don't want to be mean but maybe you should work on your trust issues.
There is no question that she strangled them. The court is trying to determine whether she was sufficiently sane at the time to be held culpable.
Not according to one of the jurors:
"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt," the woman said. "The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it. There was too much gray area."
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-juror-interview/
Couple that with the the sketchy findings about the husband's actions and whereabouts, there is indeed question and reasonable doubt.
I don't know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden's the safe bet here
My three kids are in their 20's. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I'd say they're safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
Best send them to Bin Laden then because at least they wouldn't be able to sit up all night raiding the bar.
I'd pass the Nurnberg check, so Hitler would a solid first-round pick. It's a toss about who would gendercode my kids more between him and Bin Laden. Lindsay What's-Her-Name and P. Diddy are automatic no's.
Bin laden and its not close
Western educated man who is pissed off at the US for abandoning his political ascension? Slightly better than a meth addicted turboracist, a crazy murderer, and a child molester. I doubt bin Laden is going to be able to do much opinion changing in a single evening and I doubt that he'd outright kill or molest them.
Bin Laden fathered 24 children, the first of which was with his first cousin when she was 16 and he was 17. They went on to have ten more children. The other 13 were spread amongst five other wives. They also found several beheading videos on his computer. He also believed muslims should kill any US civilians they find until the US withdraws support for Israel.
I think definitely killing and maybe molestation would be on the table.
He was a wealthy politician first, revolutionary like fifth. Shit, you're right, molestation is on the table.
The dead ones won't cause any harm.
Bin laden i guess, the other option is a child murderer, a child molester or the corpose of THE nazist soo
I....fuck, I guess....Diddy, if he doesn't have other plans. He's the only one that hasn't killed kids.
When did Osama kill kids?
I mean, collaterally maybe but he never targeted kids. Only evil pedo imperialists, which frankly puts him at the top of the list as a man of honor and as a good role model for my children.
I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
Dr Jinx
hitler first, second osama
I can see it, Hitler is my second choice too. He wouldn't hurt my kid, just stuff him full of Werther's original and have him perform physical labor which he frankly could do with.
But Osama is the clear choice here.
the crazy woman jurors is trying to make it out likes its the worst thing that happened by no acquitting him, and also railing on the male juror.
That wasn't the question.
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
Osama was also a regular engineer. That was his day job