this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68864 readers
4431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A survey of more than 2,000 smartphone users by second-hand smartphone marketplace SellCell found that 73% of iPhone users and a whopping 87% of Samsung Galaxy users felt that AI adds little to no value to their smartphone experience.

SellCell only surveyed users with an AI-enabled phone – thats an iPhone 15 Pro or newer or a Galaxy S22 or newer. The survey doesn’t give an exact sample size, but more than 1,000 iPhone users and more than 1,000 Galaxy users were involved.

Further findings show that most users of either platform would not pay for an AI subscription: 86.5% of iPhone users and 94.5% of Galaxy users would refuse to pay for continued access to AI features.

From the data listed so far, it seems that people just aren’t using AI. In the case of both iPhone and Galaxy users about two-fifths of those surveyed have tried AI features – 41.6% for iPhone and 46.9% for Galaxy.

So, that’s a majority of users not even bothering with AI in the first place and a general disinterest in AI features from the user base overall, despite both Apple and Samsung making such a big deal out of AI.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I hate that i can no longer trust what comes out of my phone camera to be an accurate representation of reality. I turn off all the AI enhancement stuff but who knows what kind of fuckery is baked into the firmware.

NO, i dont want fake AI depth of field. NO, i do not want fake AI "makeup" fixing my ugly face. NO, i do not want AI deleting tourists in the background of my picture of the eiffel tower.

NO, i do not want AI curating my memories and reality. Sure, my vacation photos have shitty lighting and bad composition. But they are MY photos and MY memories of something i experienced personally. AI should not be "fixing" that for me

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@9488fcea02a9 @ForgottenFlux I remember reading a whole article about how Samsung now just shoves a hi-res picture of the moon on top of pictures you take with the moon in so it looks like it takes impressive photos. Not sure if the scandal meant they removed that "feature" or not

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

classic techbro overhype

Add new feature into everything without seperating and offering choice to opt out of it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It is absolutely useless for everyday simple tasks I find.

Who the fuck needs AI to SUMMARIZE an EMAIL, GOOGLE?

IT'S FIVE LINES

Get out of my face Gemini!

[–] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Or the shitty notification summary. If someone wrote something to me, then it’s important enough for me to read it. I don’t need 3 bullet points with distorted info from AI.

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yahoo was using their shitty AI tool to summarize emails THEN REPLACE THE FUCKING SUBJECT LINES WITH THE SUMMARY!

It immediately hallucinated raffle winners for a sneaker company and iirc they started getting death threats.

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

It'd be way less offensive if it was just present as an option, instead of dancing around flashing at me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This is what happens when companies prioritize hype over privacy and try to monetize every innovation. Why pay €1,500 for a phone only to have basic AI features? AI should solve real problems, not be a cash grab.

Imagine if AI actually worked for users:

  • Show me all settings to block data sharing and maximize privacy.
  • Explain how you optimized my battery last week and how much time it saved.
  • Automatically silence spam calls without selling my data to third parties.
  • Detect and block apps that secretly drain data or access my microphone.
  • Automatically organize my photos by topic without uploading them to the cloud.
  • Make everything i could do with TASKER with only just saying it in plain words.
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Make everything i could do with TASKER with only just saying it in plain words.

Stop, I can only get so hard.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (11 children)

A 100% accurate AI would be useful. A 99.999% accurate AI is in fact useless, because of the damage that one miss might do.

It's like the French say: Add one drop of wine in a barrel of sewage and you get sewage. Add one drop of sewage in a barrel of wine and you get sewage.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it largely depends on what kind of AI we're talking about. iOS has had models that let you extract subjects from images for a while now, and that's pretty nifty. Affinity Photo recently got the same feature. Noise cancellation can also be quite useful.

As for LLMs? Fuck off, honestly. My company apparently pays for MS CoPilot, something I only discovered when the garbage popped up the other day. I wrote a few random sentences for it to fix, and the only thing it managed to consistently do was screw the entire text up. Maybe it doesn't handle Swedish? I don't know.

One of the examples I sent to a friend is as follows, but in Swedish;

Microsoft CoPilot is an incredibly poor product. It has a tendency to make up entirely new, nonsensical words, as well as completely mangle the grammar. I really don't understand why we pay for this. It's very disappointing.

And CoPilot was like "yeah, let me fix this for you!"

Microsoft CoPilot is a comedy show without a manuscript. It makes up new nonsense words as though were a word-juggler on circus, and the grammar becomes mang like a bulldzer over a lawn. Why do we pay for this? It is buy a ticket to a show where actosorgets their lines. Entredibly disappointing.

[–] Oggyb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's so beautifully illustrative of what the LLM is actually doing behind the curtain! What a mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Most AIs struggle with languages other than English, unfortunately, I hate how it reinforces the "defaultness" of English

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

99.999% accurate would be pretty useful. Theres plenty of misinformation without AI. Nothing and nobody will be perfect.

Trouble is they range from 0-95% accurate depending on the topic and given context while being very confident when they’re wrong.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The problem really isn't the exact percentage, it's the way it behaves.

It's trained to never say no. It's trained to never be unsure. In many cases an answer of "You can't do that" or "I don't know how to do that" would be extremely useful. But, instead, it's like an improv performer always saying "yes, and" then maybe just inventing some bullshit.

I don't know about you guys, but I frequently end up going down rabbit holes where there are literally zero google results matching what I need. What I'm looking for is so specialized that nobody has taken the time to write up an indexable web page on how to do it. And, that's fine. So, I have to take a step back and figure it out for myself. No big deal. But, Google's "helpful" AI will helpfully generate some completely believable bullshit. It's able to take what I'm searching for and match it to something similar and do some search-and-replace function to make it seem like it would work for me.

I'm knowledgeable enough to know that I can just ignore that AI-generated bullshit, but I'm sure there are a lot of other more ~~gullible~~ optimistic people who will take that AI garbage at face value and waste all kinds of time trying to get it working.

To me, the best way to explain LLMs is to say that they're these absolutely amazing devices that can be used to generate movie props. You're directing a movie and you want the hero to pull up a legal document submitted to a US federal court? It can generate one in seconds that would take your writers hours. It's so realistic that you could even have your actors look at it and read from it and it will come across as authentic. It can generate extremely realistic code if you want a hacking scene. It can generate something that looks like a lost Shakespeare play, or an intercept from an alien broadcast, or medical charts that look like exactly what you'd see in a hospital.

But, just like you'd never take a movie prop and try to use it in real life, you should never actually take LLM output at face value. And that's hard, because it's so convincing.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Much like certain other trends like 3D TVs, this helps us see how often "visionaries" at the top of a company are charmed by ideas that no one on the ground is interested in. Same with blockchain, cryptocurrency, and so many other buzzwords.

So maybe I'll mention it again: The Accountable Capitalism Act would require 40% of a company's board be made up of democratically voted employees, who can provide more practical input about how top-level decisions would affect the people working there.

I could actually see 3D TVs taking off, even with the requirement for glasses. At the time, there was a fad for 3D movies in theaters. But, they needed to have gotten with content creators so that there was a reason to own one. There was no content, so no one invested, so probably in a year or two there's going to be some Youtubers making videos of "I finally found Sony's forgotten 3D TV."

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I can see why people thought 3d tvs were a great idea, until they actually experienced it for themselves. It also didn't help that so much content wasn't genuinely shot in 3d, either, but altered in post.

[–] lack@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apple Intelligence is trash and only lasted 2 days on my 16 pro. Not turning it back on either.

[–] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I’m on my iPhone 12 since it came out in sept 2020 (I bought it on Halloween 2020 lol) and apart from battery health being 77%, I have NO reasons to upgrade and even then, I’ll change the battery when it gets to 70% and… that’s it.

Phones just aren’t exciting anymore. I used to watch so much phone reviews on YouTube and now they are all just.. the same. Folding phones aren’t that interesting for me. I saw that there is a new battery technology, but that’s like the only new fun feature I’m interested in.

Most performance upgrades aren’t used in the real world and AI suuuuucks

"PLEASE use our hilariously power inefficient wrongness machine."

[–] clonedhuman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The consumer-side AI that a handful of multi-billion-dollar companies keep peddling to us is just a way for them to attempt to justify AI to us. Otherwise, it consumes MASSIVE amounts of our energy capacities and is primarily being used in ways that harm us.

And, of course, there's nothing they direct at us that isn't ultimately (and solely) for their benefit--our every use of their AI helps train their models, and eventually it will simply be groups of billionaires competing against one another to form the most powerful model that allows them to dominate us and their competitors.

As long as this technology remains determined by those whose entire existence is organized around domination, it will be a sum harm to all of us. We'd have to free it from their grips to make it meaningful in our daily lives.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have Google Gemini turned off on my pixel, because I find that it makes my experience genuinely worse.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree. The first thing I always disable is AI, also on the TV.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Out of curiosity, what does AI do on a TV, other than voice recognition?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Steal more data

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago

Sometimes it adds unnecessary things like movie plots or cover for the program on a channel

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

People here like to shit on AI, but it has its use cases. It's nice that I can search for "horse" in Google Photos and get back all pictures of horses and it is also really great for creating small scripts. I, however, do not need a LLM chatbot on my phone and I really don't want it everywhere in every fucking app with a subscription model.

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

You type "horse" into google pictures and you get a bunch of AI generated pictures of what the model thinks horses look like.

[–] NRBQ@lemmy.studio 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only thing is Google photos did that before AI was installed. Now I have to press two extra buttons to get to the old search method instead of using the new AI because the AI gives me the most bizarre results when I use it.

[–] Dkiscoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly. My results with Gemini search are worse every single time

[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People wouldn't shit on AI if it wasn't needlessly crammed down our throats.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

people wouldn't shit on AI if it were actually replacing our jobs without taking our pay and creating a system of resource management free from human greed and error.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lmuel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

"AI" (as in LLMs for the sake of having LLMs accessible on your phone) is so fucking useless...

From a technical standpoint it's pretty cool, I love playing around with Ollama on my PC every now and then.

But the average Joe seems to think it's some magic being with absolute fucking knowledge you can talk to using your phone. Apart from being stupid, I think this might actually endanger human capabilities like critical thinking as well as reasoning and creativity.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

So many people use "Chat Jippity" to look up stuff. I know google is enshitificated.. but OH MY GOD.

After having mostly relevant Information available for everyone, the zone was flooded with Advertisement and FakeNews, and now the FakeNews are generated directly on the User's device.. no interaction and connection to anyone necessary.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"Stop trying to make ~~fetch~~ AI happen. It's not going to happen."

AI is worse that adding no value, it is an actual detriment.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I feel like I'm in those years of You really want a 3d TV, right? Right? 3D is what you've been waiting for, right? all over again, but with a different technology.

It will be VR's turn again next.

I admit I'm really rooting for affordable, real-world, daily-use AR though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My kids school just did a survey and part of it included questions about teaching technology with a big focus on the use of AI. My response was "No" full stop. They need to learn how to do traditional research first so that they can spot check the error ridden results generated by AI. Damn it school, get off the bandwagon.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

AI is useless and I block it anyway I can.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's because it is.

Pointless resource hogging bloatware.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I hate that nowadays AI == LLM/chatbot.

I love the AI classifiers that keep me safe from spam or that help me categorise pictures. I love the AI based translators that allow me to write in virtually any language almost like a real speaker.

What I hate is these super advanced stocastic parrots that manage to pass the Turing test and, so, people assume they think.

I am pretty sure that they asked specifically about LLM/chatbots the percentage of people not caring would be even higher

load more comments