top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 125 points 1 week ago (18 children)

That’s how AI is going to kill us… It will fake something and make us bomb ourselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 118 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    It doesn't help that the people currently in charge are fucking stupid, trigger happy, and emotionally insecure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Right so in the end it never was about the machines. In the end, it was man's folly which would have been our inevitable demise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 41 points 1 week ago

    Right it’s not that it’s a killer sentient machine, it’s that it’s a faulty statistical model that outputs incorrect stuff all the time and credulous morons believe it uncritically (or even automate a response based on that inherently inaccurate output).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 81 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Wait, I've seen this movie before....

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    I see now why Trump has his eye on Greenland

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I feel like ballistic missile defense was always his point of Greenland

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Occupying Greenland and the Canadian arctic was almost entirely about detecting bombers coming over the pole. Subs and ICBMs made those bases useless. But Trump could literally think it's 1965.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    To believe that man has any intentions behind is actions is wild. He's easier to steer than a toddler with sugar treats. Someone told him to do it, everyone else complained, he tripled down to own the libs. He has no long term plans there, someone else might, but unless you can tell me who...we cant really assume assumptions. My guess is Putin told him to do the Greenland thing to destabilize nato

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 60 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    oh my fucking god

    just dial the doomsday clock to 1am, because we'll probably miss it anyway if it's up to a few morons and glorified predictive text, both seemingly in "fucking kill everything" mode

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Anyone letting a black box that cannot be audited make decisions should be immediately fired and barred from any leadership position for the rest of their lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 49 points 1 week ago*
    [–] 26 points 1 week ago

    We're nearing the end of the prelude to a Fallout game.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Techbros: AI will become sentient and kill us all unless its done my way.

    Reality: Skip the sentience part we're already at the death bit.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    This is the kind of existential dangers that AI poses. Not skynet, no rogue AI escaping, no AGI that decides another fate for us.. it’s going to happen because of a stupid human mistake as we abandon our critical thinking abilities. One day we’re going to launch a nuke, or blow up something in the wrong country, not AI, us, blindly following the hallucinations of a billionaire’s toy.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    I wonder when does the AI also hallicunate the sources such as webpages, pdfs, reports to prove its hallucinated point.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Not far. Current LLMs have kinda stubbornness. They cling to their own conclusions even after you told them they are wrong. So if you ask them for proof, then most times they come up with something that's convincing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    You know the thing where AI companies describe their alignment direction as "Honest, Harmless, Helpful"?

    The only one that's marketable to the idiots buying AI services is Helpful. So that's always top priority even when it goes against the other two.

    Average decider wouldn't stand an "assistant" that sometimes answers "I don't know". So instead agent providers train their already hallucination-prone model to be 100% confident in whatever it says. Who cares if it's true if it looks like it is?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    When- they don’t have “stubbornness“- they have a weights set (a weighted probbility table) and a training model (a text file filled with compressed text coordinates) that the llm cant write to to give positive feedback to the weights. It’s less of a matter of “convincing“ and more of an issue of “making the resulting statement logically concurrent with the probability table thats inbuilt into the system by injesting stack overflow vote talley, reddit posts voted most popular” - that makes it hard to “convince”. Since making those weights is very expensive (an energy intensive), the developers usually incorporate the old model into the new one. TLDR: yet again, lazy programming, google up: the y2k date folks in the 70’s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Holy fucking shit, not during the stupidest fucking administration in the history of the world NOT DURING THE STUPIDEST FUCKING ADMINISTRATION IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

    I bet there's some degree of sensationalist reporting here. It's a bit too reminiscent of WarGames for me to believe this actually happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    War Games was a computer planning planet destroying nuke attacks because it was taught to play chess and not tic tac toe. it needed to learn about pointless victory. This is a bunch of jackasses in a room buying a thinky box asking it questions and taking the answers seriously enough to go to war relieving themselves of the burden of thought and common sense. this isn't War Games, it's a classic Star Trek episode except Kirk never shows up to teach us that you can't let a fucking computer program run your fucking military intelligence, because that's INSANE. Why would you do that? you need multiple human eyes on everything going on, you can't let a fucking language model do it for you... my god.... it's children doing their homework with AI, except their homework is the apparatus that used to enforce the rule of law on a global scale. granted, that was always a lie as it's more the gun that enforced colonial interests, but still. a gun that decides it need to start shooting random people who could win a war against us depending on the lines drawn and the time frame is a pretty dangerous thing to let go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 12 points 1 week ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago
    [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Do we're bombing Chinese vessels now? Wtf?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago
    [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    sooner or later they are going to have friendly fire, and hallucinate one of thier own US navy vessels as "foreign with nuclear capabilities"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Fucking hell

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›