But who's taking that photo.
post
Studio Biederer was managed along with his brother, they produced some work that still looks very.... contemporary. Specially their bdsm shots.
Here's an archive of their work.
https://studiobiederer.wordpress.com/2026/06/15/mistress-at-work/
Reminds me of modern social media pictures in two ways...
One, someone is taking a photo of someone taking a photo
Two, he's done some trick photography so he can play both people in the photo
Get yourself a man who looks at you like Jaques Biederer looks at genitals
It actually goes further back to 1830s and Dagguerotypes: https://www.all-about-photo.com/photography-article/607/a-brief-history-of-nude-photography-1839-1939
He was definitely not the first photographer to specialise in that. Photographic pornography was invented basically the same time as photography was.
Looks like he enjoys his job....
Nsfw this please
Realistically, you shouldn't be looking at this site at work at all.
Come up with a widely recognized abbreviation for ‘flag this so it’s blurred for people browsing their phone in public’ if it bothers you 🤷♂️
Maybe you should take it as a sign that you should read actual books?
Because I’m on my phone (which has accessibility features to keep me from getting motion sickness) on the bus instead of reading a book? Weird conclusion to jump to
Real strict at your Nunnery, huh?
Some of us go outside and don’t want to be flashing what OP described as erotica at whatever children are looking over our shoulders.
OP didn't describe the picture as erotica. That's a picture of the dude taking those erotic pics.
Wanting people to unintentionally flash this photo to kids in public is fucking weird.
all 24 comments