all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 6 days ago (1 child)

But who's taking that photo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    Studio Biederer was managed along with his brother, they produced some work that still looks very.... contemporary. Specially their bdsm shots.

    Here's an archive of their work.

    https://studiobiederer.wordpress.com/2026/06/15/mistress-at-work/

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    Reminds me of modern social media pictures in two ways...

    One, someone is taking a photo of someone taking a photo

    Two, he's done some trick photography so he can play both people in the photo

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago

    Bet he saw some fuzzy beavers.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 1 week ago*

    Get yourself a man who looks at you like Jaques Biederer looks at genitals

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 week ago
    [–] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    He was definitely not the first photographer to specialise in that. Photographic pornography was invented basically the same time as photography was.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Looks like he enjoys his job....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -16 points 1 week ago (11 children)
  • [–] 17 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Realistically, you shouldn't be looking at this site at work at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    Come up with a widely recognized abbreviation for ‘flag this so it’s blurred for people browsing their phone in public’ if it bothers you 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Maybe you should take it as a sign that you should read actual books?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Because I’m on my phone (which has accessibility features to keep me from getting motion sickness) on the bus instead of reading a book? Weird conclusion to jump to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    Real strict at your Nunnery, huh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Some of us go outside and don’t want to be flashing what OP described as erotica at whatever children are looking over our shoulders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    OP didn't describe the picture as erotica. That's a picture of the dude taking those erotic pics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Wanting people to unintentionally flash this photo to kids in public is fucking weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments