top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm glad it comes with a Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme instead of one that's not Elite or Extreme

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    over $1k

    Golly! Look at that Epstein Class price tag! And not even an audio jack to show for it! Who knows what else it's lacking.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 days ago* (109 children)

    Does anyone know if it has a headphone jack? It seems dumb to brag about having B&O work on the audio if not, but I am still thinking it won't which will kill any interest in it.

    Edit: I confirmed it does not have one. total junk

  • source
  • hideshow 109 child comments
  • load more comments (99 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Over $1000 but no headphone jack?? It's such a basic request for a privacy based phone

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    It's not a privacy based phone. It's a phone they're hoping to sell to mass market consumers that so happens to be about to run a privacy based OS.

    You are not the target audience and will continue to not be unless people like you become the dominant consumer of such a device. The problem is the people who enjoy this community, by and large, own a pixel 3 and won't purchase anything unless it's got every feature they want.

    Even more unfortunately is those features only end up on cheap phones because manufacturers correlated them with poor people. Need a headphone jack? Must be too poor to afford Bluetooth headphones. Need an sd card slot? Must be too poor to afford a cloud subscription or bigger phone. Need a removable battery or to repair your device? You obviously can't afford to buy a new phone every 2 years.

    The bottom line is you are all too sensible to spend the money and influence design decisions so this is what you get.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Those cameras are stupid, 200MP is utter nonsense, no SD card slot is insane.. I wish Graphene would pick a better phone

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 days ago (17 children)

    ik it's subjective but the phone's design looks really bad. can't afford it anyway but..

    screenshot of gsmarena page of that phone

    gsmarena

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    I think people going for this hardware + OS are more of a function over form crowd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 days ago

    90W charging, huge storage option, high quality cameras (I already have a billion lenses on the back of my phone so I just don't give a shit), great screen - yeah I don't care how the thing looks. I care about GrapheneOS support and that it has the hardware to keep it usable for more than a couple of years.

    Right now its between this and a flip phone + umpc for me. We'll see where things go in the coming months.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 days ago (16 children)
    load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    I'll probably get downvotes but the phone is SO ugly

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    I know they already said to expect flagships, but it's still very disappointing to me.

    Personally, I'm just never going to buy a phone with something like the 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, a flagship among flagships.

    What are you supposed to do with a beast like that? It's just a lot of money wasted, because nothing you'll ever use a smartphone for requires even 50% of that performance.

    I hope some cheaper, weaker options will be supported by Graphene too.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    This is awesome; first non-google phone supported. It us a bit on the expensive side for me, but a good step in the right direction.

    Hopefully they will be able to get Motorola/Qualcomm to have the required security features on a lower end SoC and hence phone.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›