top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 4 days ago (15 children)

Maybe this is a bad take from someone with no military knowledge, but I never understand how "we need bodies for the meat grinder" so let's do conscription is often only mandatory for men?

You're either going to shove a gun in their hand and point them in the direction to shoot, have them run some equipment/weapon, or have them in a support role. Both men and women can do those things equally well.

Any very generalized physical differences between men and women would have minimal difference in the ability to carry out their tasks.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 days ago (7 children)

    Procreation. Long term it's less worse if it's half the men that get shot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    This assumes human women are some kind of breeding facility, which they Are not, few men won't impregnate many women if not for apocalyptic scenarios, there fore that argument doesn't work. A young mother needs a lot of support, a man that just gives his semen and disappears afterwards is not very helpful in that case. Children are a multiplayer experience for a long time, not just a moment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    One claim always has been, that "typical woman" is gonna have a hard time to carry wounded "typical man" to safety. But that's bullshit anyway, because a small guy is gonna have a hard time carrying big guy just as well, and that doesn't save them from conscription.

    Another take I heard during duty was "you serve 9 months, a woman gives her body during pregnacy for 9 months for the fatherland" 😅. Like, ok, didn't know forced pregnancy was a common occurrence ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    The german constitution's article 12a has a clause on drafting women for work in field hospitals, but also explicitly states they can't be forced into combat roles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    really fucking weird comments down here. people supporting forced military service. tf

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago

    Some of the older, really damaged boomers I've known in my life are pro forced military service at 18. They think it will harden the youth because either they were forced into it ir they don't understand that their trauma damaged them, it made them compassionless, not stronger/better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Honestly, nowadays I think that conscription should be seen more like an education on how to defend yourself within the organized structures of the state, and maybe should also be implemented more in those lines. And such is necessary nowadays. I didn't have to go and since I had my plans made I also didn't but I have been considering to maybe look whether I can still at least learn a lite version of it. How many conscripted were forced to fight in the last decades? The first to go, and the only ones since probably the second world war (in germany), is the professional army, no conscripted is forced. Of course once we are in a true conflict to the point that the professional army isn't sufficient anymore this starts to change, but then it would change for you regardless of whether you have trained the basics or not, and then I would prefer knowing what I do and how to do it, whether I have to or want to defend the society, friends, family etc. in an organized structure or not.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    If anything, the Bundeswehr should simply copy the Finnish Reserve model. One better be prepared for the fucking Muscovites as a possible deterrence, because they are far from finished. As long as Vlad receives public support, he can continue to send troops into the meat grinder and that is how the Russians wear you down. They do not give a rat's ass about losses. Nobody with a sane mind would want to be occupied by the Russians.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago (16 children)

    I think people live in a fairy tale.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago (13 children)

    Or they understand the only realistic military threat they could face is a second-rate power unable to conquer its much smaller nextdoor neighbor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago* (10 children)

    That's right Ukraine is just waving that off without a sweat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    Okay let me put it like this: Germany is spending more annually on its military than Ukraine ($84 billion vs $114 billion in 2025) despite only the latter being at war. The economic and technological ability to wage war isn't even comparable between those two countries. Now of course war is about more than just money, but in industrial warfare money does matter a lot. So does industrial capacity, which again Germany has much more of. And that's Germany alone, not even the whole EU. In the absence of competing evidence I'm very comfortable assuming that Germany would do much better than Ukraine if attacked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    How many troops does Germany have vs Ukraine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    What I can tell you is that Russia's best chance would still be to face a country one by one.

    Even if you don't care or underestimate the capacity of them to wage war, being ready is your best deterrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›