California has officially banned child marriage, with Governor Gavin Newsom signing legislation to end the practice that is still legal in 32 US states.

The new law, which will come into effect on 1 January, states people must be 18 to get married in the Golden State.

Newsom called it a "long overdue measure to protect young Californians and minors". He signed the bill into law with Courtney Stodden, whose parents allowed her to marry a 50-year-old Hollywood actor when she was just 16.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 97 points 1 week ago (3 children)

propose the ban in all 50 states

investigate every single elected official who comes out in opposition

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 1 week ago (19 children)

    From Wikipedia:

    Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Oklahoma do not allow underage marriage. The other states allow an underage person to marry in the following circumstances:

    If one or more of the following apply:

    • consent of the parents or legal guardians of the >minor
    • consent of a court clerk or judge
    • if the minor is emancipated.

    Or in exceptional circumstances if one or more of the following circumstances apply:

    • consent of a superior court judge, rather than a local judge, is required
    • if one of the parties is pregnant
    • if the minor has given birth to a child

    Basically, in these places, there's a loophole where offenders can marry their rape victims after the fact to make it look proper for the church or something. That and also allow parents or guardians to sell minors into arranged marriages.

    I wonder if anyone was dumb enough to oppose this ban and if so we should list them.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago* (12 children)

    https://calmatters.org/politics/2026/09/california-child-marriage/

    Unfortunately, Planned Parenthood and the ACLU are pro-child marriage and they spend big to keep it legal.

    Children have a right to marry, the ACLU argues, and stripping them of that right would take away a pathway to their emancipation and independent healthcare decisions. For Planned Parenthood, the freedom for children to marry is about allowing people reproductive choice and bodily autonomy.

    But their efforts have repeatedly failed in California, where Planned Parenthood and the ACLU have lobbied hard against restricting child marriage, although those groups have largely stayed silent on the issue in other Democratic-controlled states.

    In a June opposition letter, the organization wrote, “Prohibiting minors from marrying in every case is a departure from California’s longstanding commitment to honoring minors’ ability to make important personal decisions for themselves, particularly in the realm of reproductive autonomy.”

    These two organizations are entirely misled and spreading misleading information on this issue and are harming kids (vast majority are young girls) with that rhetoric above. Emancipation and reproductive autonomy should not be tied to marriage in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    That's interesting. I almost always side with those two orgs so I'll have to read more about why they take this position. The way you state it sounds pretty bad.

    I remember distinctly it was like to be a teenager and realize I was every bit as capable of making rational decisions as the adults around me, and frustrated that it wasn't really recognized. That's not to say it was true for my peers or didn't require being well-informed in the first place. But as a result I'm generally in favor of lessening restrictions on minors where there's no direct harm and raising penalties on adults who manipulate or abuse them. So I'll hold out some hope that these orgs want that but are just communicating it poorly (still a problem, but more easily solved).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Planned Parenthood is also lobbying against the billionaire tax, due to their belief it would lower healthcare funding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    How the fuck do they come up with this conclusion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Two rationales are being lobbied:

    1. The billionaires will leave the state, lowering overall taxes gathered in the long-term.

    2. The law doesn't provide safeguards on how the money will be used, so it won't go towards the things the law says it will.

    I think both are bullshit reasons that billionaires and their leaches use to allow billionaires to continue fucking over the world, but they sound legit to people who don't have access to a ton of data.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 week ago (20 children)

    Weird how the USA has so much in common with countries like Saudi Arabia, yemen, Somalia

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Map of places where a judge can OK a marriage. I’m not saying the USA is good, but Europe has plenty of spots wheee you can technically marry as a 16 year old (or less). Worldwide problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago*

    So, apparently, does France. France has the same exceptions to allow 16 year olds to marry adults. And Spain. And Italy. And virtually the entirety of Eastern Europe. Belgium has no minimum age as long as a judge allows it.

    If you look at the map of where minors can get married to adults without parental consent, Scotland is more lenient than anywhere in the US. Scotland is actually one of a tiny tiny few countries that allow minors to marry adults without any exceptions required. Adults can just outright marry children in Scotland without issue. Only 7 countries in the world allow that. Most in Africa and the Middle East. And then Scotland.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    Its not popular - hence why it's changing. Nuance is lost on the internet, but people really need to start chilling out about making blanket assumptions of huge swaths of people.

    Its one of the "automatic assumptions" people have - that it IS illegal. So they wouldn't bother looking it up.

    Most Americans don't have the slightest idea of what is/isn't legal. Gotta remember, before the internet, you had to get a physical copy of your state's statutes. These change frequently, and are quite large.

    Legalinfo first started in 1994, and it took a much longer time before states have their own websites.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    For those who don't understand why child marriage is usually a spectacularly bad idea for the underaged partner in one:

    https://unchainedatlast.org/child-marriage-in-the-u-s/

    Also includes map of which states allow underage marriage and under what conditions, as well as a map of youngest allowable marriage in that state (apparently both NM and MS have no lower limit).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Basically exactly what I expected the map, save for 2

    Kudos to Oklahoma. Would not have expected them to have strong anti-child marriage laws

    Shame on Illinois. Didn't expect them to be so receptive of child marriage

    Sorry to any other outliars I may have missed. Generally seems to be Republicans in favor of child marriage, with Democratic states banning it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Now how are Republicans supposed to get a date?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    This is how I learned there is at least one state (Mississipi) where you can get married aged 0

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Don’t you remember that classic Mississippi game show, “Who Wants to Marry a Baby? No, seriously, who actually wants to marry a real baby? Like, legally. Meaning all of the legal protections of marriage apply to you and this actual infant. Who wants to? It’s legal. Chris Hansen isn’t here. This isn’t a sting. It’s legal for whatever god forsaken reason. Fuck this stupid fucking backwards ass state.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    But if I can't give my 14 year old daughter to Tom down the street, he won't give me 3 goats.

    Dude I need that dowry. I love my daughter, sure. But not like I love goats.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›