all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

The technology to eradicate homelessness, hunger, war, climate change, and Cap’n Crunch cereal all exist too, but I don’t see anyone addressing those either.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Wouldn't that reduce the dragon fly population as well (who eats mosquito larva)?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    They eat other things as well. Supposedly mosquitoes are pretty much the only living thing that's completely useless, and can be eradicated with no ill effects.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    You don't need to be brave to use mosquito nets.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago

    dangerously overconfident

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    It shouldn’t have to take fifteen years to deploy effective products that can save lives

    this is such a reductionist view.

    it should absolutely take decades to make a sweeping decision to fundamentally alter an ecosystem. nobody likes disease or even getting a random bite. i grew up in the swamps of the US, i know. but we should absolutely know what we’re doing to release a genetically engineered or bacterial sterilizing agent into a naturally evolved ecosystem.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Ok. You can take decades if you have a systematic plan with data collection, time lines, expanded test beds, and reviews of emerging relevant science. But sitting on your hands for 15yrs isn't very productive.

    People have been more than happy to do this with the food we eat under accelerated time lines (I'm not defending that, but it's not like there isn't precedent for genetic meddling at scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    they did mention doing harmonization studies, which is my biggest worry: cascading ecological effects.

    the impetus can’t be “oh well they haven’t done the full studies so i guess we just full send and see what happens”.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    These techniques are targeted at individual species, not all mosquitoes, and the species in question are invasive species. If it was targeting native mosquitoes your comment would make more sense, but in this case the ecological effects should be neutral to positive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    Careful. Targeted bacteriological or viral methods can adapt once out in the open. What you ultimately cause may not be what was intended. What other creatures share traits that might be susceptible? Let's not pretend we've genomapped and understood everything out there.

    Also mosquitos and their larvae are food for parts of the food web. If they are gone, what starves?

    Unintended consequences are a real risk. Careful study should be required.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    There's a large difference between 15 years of science to make sure something doesn't do more harm than it prevents, and taking a decade before someone even declares themselves as responsible for evaluating anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    A system to kill a fuck ton with lasers has existed for decades, but a patent troll is sitting on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    so yeah. genociding species tends not to end well. That being said we actually just need to eliminate the disease spreading mosquitos and don't need to get rid of them all so. maybe.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    These technologies are pretty much unable to completely genocide mosquitos unless deployed worldwide in an massive effort, which noone wants to actually do - they are really only problematic in areas where mosquitos and blood-borne diseases which get transmitted by them happen to coexist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    A lot of technology to do a lot of cool shit already exists, we just refuse to use them

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Mosquitoes are my mortal enemy, unless someone can prove their eradication will disrupt the food chain so much that great white sharks will disappear ... Push play already.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment