You have to wade past a ton shit you'd never purposely look at, get side tracked along the way, and still never see everything you originally set out to see. It's a never ending loot box for content.

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 34 minutes ago

So are pages, if you're on an enshittified attention-economy website

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago

    I've never thought about it like that but you're right. I definitely have that same burst of serotonin from finding a great post that you get when you get a rare.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    How the scrollbar works says nothing about what's on the page. You could make similar claims about web pages in general — you never really know if you'll get what you were looking for. If anything, having to click "next" to try again would make it more like a loot box. But still not much like a loot box, usually.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

    The difference is the intention.

    In general, a webpage has all the information it thinks you need. A forum allows the user to choose what content they want.

    You find what you're looking for, you get the laugh, rub one out, whatever, call it a day and go about your business.

    Oh, no, no, no... there's so much more attention to extract from the user... with a game.

    Conversely, a scroll is designed to manipulate your dopamine by restricting your ability to choose and creating artificial scarcity. They deliberately inject not only ads and propaganda but content you're not interested in so that you will have to continually chase the content. The "loot" is the content. The "loop" is their payoff.

    In fact, behavioral science has identified the optimal range of hit to miss odds your brain calculates that keeps target seeking behavior at the highest level.

    Ever notice the "not interested in this kind of content" buttons don't work very well? Or are temporary at best? Hmm, wonder why that is. The illusion of choice, the restriction of choice, curated randomness... it's all packaged in the infinite scroll.

    Of course, cut out the creepy stuff and it still functions as a kind of interactive content experience which is why it's pervaded every site. Too bad it's a shit design that wastes your time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    I do not accept "infinite scroll" as shorthand for all that bullshit. I don't like infinite scroll much myself, for other reasons, but this is the Fediverse. There are plenty of people around here looking at pages containing nothing but things in chronological order posted by people they chose to follow, and choosing to load more by scrolling down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    I think the difference with the Fediverse is there is an end. There is old content. You catch up to where you left off. It's not truly an "infinite scroll" in the way OP is referring to.

    With stuff like Reddit, they organize to where it all feels recent, it's all relevant, and it's all new. Every time you refresh, new psuedo-random (algorithmic) content takes it's place. They almost prevent you from seeing old content. The "infinite scroll" is more like "infinite content".

    In this way, they put people in an endless loop. People always have something to find, and because of the infinite scroll, you'll always have a good chance of finding "rares". It's exhausting once you notice it.

    At least I can tell I've opened Lemmy too many times today because all of the recent posts are marked as read.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Have you tried it though? I find that it's not lootbox-like in any way, although to some extent I suppose it depends on who you follow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Tried it? You can't escape it, lol.

    I've got my feed set up. It works about as well as it can. Lemmy is a particularly good place for it, low content, less users, and no ads.

    As a core concept, I wouldn't have a problem with it, provided we actually had way more levers to adjust the algorithms.

    In larger settings it's a complete nightmare, even on sites that aren't trying to generate ad revenue.

    Even as someone who lived through the static webpage and forum era and loved it, reverting to that feels like going backwards in progress. But without finer controls over the algorithm, the general application of scrolling is ass and detrimental to good life/screen time balance. There should be some kind of middle ground or new structure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Pages are so much better than infinite scroll

    and ye, fuck youtube for making 80% of results be shorts, I'm not looking for this bullshit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago

    There is only one headline I'm looking for 🪦

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Wow, this might be beyond the scope of a showerthought meme because you've got my gears turning. This actually makes sense -- design is a series of decisions at the end of the day, never thought about it in the interaction element and intention sense. Algorithms of doom fucking everything up, puts this interaction element into dark pattern territory.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Right?

    Stripped down to its core it's innocent enough. It's just the capacity for getting deep into the dopamine feedback loop that's worrisome. Meta's sites, Reddit, a ton of wannabe sites use it to its full potential. People can spend all day scrolling, brain fried, emotionally tapped out, and still feeling hungry and dissatisfied.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    About that, i have "infinite scrolling" off in Voyager but it doesn't paginate, still infinite scroll.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    I think it's more useful to think of it in terms of a Skinner box. Loot boxes, gacha, and most other mechanics in modern games are all variants of operant conditioning, and doomscrolling is a different, but equally insidious, manifestation thereof. The way the Skinner Box gets you is by giving you little, consistent hits of pleasure, keeping you performing a rote act, and so you get conditioned to perform that act continuously, even after you no longer derive pleasure, or after the actual reward has been removed. This is precisely what doomscrolling is.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This suggests that I expect to win or even gain anything when I open any social media site/app.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    yup, doomscrolling is basically waiting for something alluring to grab our attention

  • source