top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 184 points 1 week ago (21 children)

I applaud the troll aspect of it all, but imma stick with GIMP.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago (17 children)

    Was gonna say, gimp is open source and mature, why the hell would users use this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Because Photoshop is far superior to gimp for.... reasons? But Photoshop costs $$$$$, so this is like free.

    /s

    Honestly, the only thing not to like about GIMP is the name. There was a fork a while ago, but that closed down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Non-destructive transforms not existing is definitely a thing not to like about GIMP

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    @LegoBrickOnFire @plateee For raster layers, yes (at the moment). You can do non-destructive transforms on vector layers and link layers (so you could add an external PNG/JPEG/SVG/etc to a composition as a layer and then non-destructively transform it).

    Transforms are really a filter under the hood, so we have the infrastructure to make them all non-destructive. Just need to work on the UI elements. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 74 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    Using the thing of the enemy to destroy the other thing of the enemy... yeah that's justice. (but really though, I rather use actual homegrown open source projects like Krita instead of faux Photoshop)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I yearned to be a savior against injustice without contemplating the cost and by the time I looked down there was no longer any ground beneath my feet. What is my sacrifice? I'm condemned to use the tools of my enemy to defeat them. I burn my decency for someone else's future. I burn my life to make a sunrise that I know I'll never see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 44 points 1 week ago* (11 children)

    Context? Did someone decompile photoshop?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    They used an AI model to repeatedly generate guesses of the code until it matched the compiled bytecode, then AI-generated new code based on the decompiled source to create a technically unique codebase that can do most of the same functions and looks extremely close to the original.

    Has essentially every feature, but also bugs out a lot or has features that technically work, but not in the same way as Photoshop (e.g. magic wand selection tool might bug out and select stuff on more than one layer, and might be less accurate and selecting fine edges)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 1 week ago* (4 children)

    It’s been found that LLMs are actually great at decompiling things. Whereas before this process was possible but very time consuming, LLMs can do it in hours/days depending on the software.

    So there’s a group that is decompiling Adobe software and rewriting it in Rust, and then published the apps + rewritten code

    Edit: then there’s the larger implication, that is that pretty much any software can become open source now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    So we have AIs turning proprietary software into open source software, and AIs rewriting open source software into proprietary software. Wonder what will happen if we run this in a loop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Ever since the latest AI models have come out, closed source essentially ceased to be. You can get something closely resembling the original source code from just about any running binary now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    I saw the LTT video on this. Seems I was right in thinking that the program isn't smooth enough to be usable. I saw give it a few months and it might be a serious contender

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (4 children)

    I hope this means Photoshop will be functional on Linux sooner rather than later?

    ETA: coming from someone with little to no knowledge about program code btw

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    It's been ai slop decompiled so nearly useless to actual developers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I thought the AI translates the decompiled code into human readable language rather than doing the actual decomp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    The general goal of a decompilation is to convert machine code back into something that, when compiled, generates machine code that is similar to or identical to the original machine code. But most decompilation projects also aim to make sure that the decompiled code is actually workable by humans so as to preserve, port, extend and generally make a codebase that has clear intent and may be similar to the code used to write the original software.

    Ai decompilations are often done such that they technically check the first box, but are completely unusable for a normal engineer to want to use due to insane verbosity or in some cases just getting context or intent entirely wrong. Without proper guidance, the codebase is basically just an incoherent mess. With deep guidance, it would still take ages for these projects to be decompiled. For reference of how long they take and how thorough a proper decompilation can be check out the jak 1 decompilation project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    It is funny how adobe was one of the first company to steal people cloud images to train their ai. Now AI stealing their entire company.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    How long until the "developers" drop this project because they have no idea what the code does or how to maintain it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Full compatibility with Windows apps on Wine when?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The Sloppening.

    Honestly, I'm so here for this even though I hate slop.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago*

    How are they handling the patents? Somebody might get sued real bad.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›