This cartoon from The Seattle Times illustrates how America's economic pizza is actually sliced per capita, highlighting the massive disparity between the Top 1%, the merely wealthy, the upper middle class, and the lower 50%.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 hour ago

Wealth concentration today is 3x worse than at the height of the gilded age.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 hours ago

    it HAS destroyED America

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 hours ago

    Why are they banned?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    Conservatives insist this is the only way. As long as conservatives exist, the normal people will never be permitted to regulate capitalism or charge billionaires with crimes.

    We must delete the foot-soldiers to defeat the billionaire class.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago

    Hyper Rich muthafuckas down voting. Happy for ya.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 12 hours ago

    Very funny to see this at the top of my feed when the poster is banned.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago* (3 children)

    I take issue with the lower class being illustrated as overweight

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    Ive read the Seattle Times for decades.Horsey has gotten better. He's had some really bad takes in the past.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago* (7 children)

    No, the people with crumbs STILL doing nothing despite having nothing to lose will allow America to be destroyed.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (4 children)

    That's right, and none of the blame goes to the people who decide where the money goes and how it is spent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago* (3 children)

    You’ve spent half a century watching these people and knowing exactly what they will do. Sure, I guess if it makes you feel better, you can “blame them” the same way I’d blame a bunch of 12-year-olds playing with fireworks in a warehouse full of gasoline. But at a certain point, the people who knew exactly what was going to happen and kept allowing them to obtain matches are the ones who need to be held responsible and deserve whatever they get if not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (2 children)

    Can we identify those people? If not, there is no point in talking about holding them responsible. You risk burning energy with no result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Capitalism is just feudalism with more math.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 112 points 1 day ago
    [–] 131 points 1 day ago (37 children)

    I cannot stop seeing this idea overlaid on every thing that I see or do or hear about. Every action is filtered through the lens of it being extractive and manipulative.

    I feel extremely stressed because I see the bars of the cage and no one else around me wants to acknowledge them.

    I do not like this. I would like it to stop please.

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Yes and the middle class who think they have money keep voting for this.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago

    In my experience the difference in voting is really between the educated class and the uneducated class. Educated people are tend to be left wing. Uneducated people tend to be right wing. I'm pretty sure the data bears that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I like "this is not a joke". I really appreciate anybody trying to put into perspective how insanely unequal things are by using real numbers where possible.

    The problem is that things are so unequal that it's just about impossible to illustrate. For example, the "Top 1%" label is perfectly accurate, but doesn't illustrate both how small and also how large the top 1% is. 1% is still 3.5 million people, which is large. It isn't just Bezos and Musk. It's also guys who own car dealerships.

    OTOH, it's also small. There are 4 people in that illustration, and the "top 1%" should really be 1 guy in a room of 100.

    It's also hard to remember that the "lower 50%" isn't just "the poors". It's literally half the people in the country. It's not 1 guy at a table with 4 people who is only getting crumbs, it's half the people at that table getting crumbs. I would bet that at least 80% of Americans think they're richer than the bottom 50%.

    That's also without trying to deal with the issue of "1 billion dollars", which just isn't a number that people have much ability to picture. 1 billion feels like it's similar to "1 million", but it's not.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    As a top 1 percenter, I feel seriously offended by the suggestion that I'd sit anywhere close peasants, let alone at the same table.

    /s obviously, because I wouldn't be on lemmy if I was anywhere close the top 1%

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Actually the top 1% in the US is ~600k per year. It's a lot of cash but not entirely outside the realm of possibility for some extremely senior software architect/manager combo at some VC startup, which is also within the lemmy target audience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    How about a different kinda slicing?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 day ago (8 children)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›