The internet isn’t what we think. It is physical, subject to the vagaries of nature and time, just as our bodies are. Like us, it will flicker and fade. The internet’s fragility crops up everywhere: in the sudden disappearance of a relied-­upon website, and in the endless thrum of posts, images, and videos.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 5 hours ago

In meteorology, clouds are also physical objects with a size and a weight and a limited lifespan that are subject to the vagaries of nature and time? It seems like a fine metaphor?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    And again, the Internet is not something that you just evaporate water into; it's not a cloud. It's a series of tubes.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Err... A decade or two late on that realisation there buddy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    can’t read the article but does the author suggest an alternative? bit silly to complain without that.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    This article has almost nothing to say. It's a bit like writing an article saying: "The water that comes out of your tap doesn't just magically appear through an interdimensional portal. It actually relies on a whole infrastructure of water treatment plants, reservoirs, pumps and pipes. Sometimes a pipe springs a leak and actual real living breathing people have to go and fix it."

    Yeah thanks, what are you actually trying to say? Nothing? Ok.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    I upvoted because yes you are right to a degree, but communication is really important and shapes the relation the average consumer has with the product.

    Your tap water comes through pipes, laid in the ground, some rusty some not, some you get warnings that they're not safe to drink from. The systems around it are made to highlight its health risks if any.

    Clouds though are clean, white, up in the sky, they're a force of nature. using it as a metaphor almost makes it sound like we've harnessed something that was already there, it doesn't instill the same image as stacks and stacks of computers in a heavily ventilated building that could be around the corner.

    You could reasonably group this together with the abstraction of files and folders to apps for gen alpha and newer, now settings for your application aren't in a readily accessible file, a program isn't just an executable, it's an ✨app✨ that has its own settings and folder structure hidden away from you. All the transparency of how things work is polished out of the experience, all in order to instill trust and increase profits. A layman won't realise that the viruses his pc can get are also something that can happen to "the cloud", similarly what files are there to worry about being stolen from a phone when they can't even see them because the app has them in its own folders?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    The cloud is other peoples computers. Shocker. The mechanism by which we lose computational agency. Those datacenters, even if they're not being used to take all jobs (didn't fly, yet) are great at monitoring video feeds and killing home (personal) computing, can't afford RAM, here's a compute subscription forever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago*

    I agree. Home computing has a lot to offer, but it's not for most people who never even change the application defaults. They certainly don't want to configure and maintain home services. For most people, the alternative isn't a privacy-centric service, it's no service at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 13 hours ago

    Interesting.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago*

    The cloud is a great metaphor. It represents all that software that we expect to just "be there", without any thought to where it might be. Of course software needs a platform to run on, but it is designed so it doesn't matter where it is run. Your phone just finds it. It couldn't care less where the server is, it just connects, and you get your cat pictures, as long as you are connected to the Internet.

    The physical manifestation of the cloud is all those servers in datacenters, with redundant connectivity and power, designed to run and be connected 24/7/365.26 . They are designed with failures and redundancy in mind. It can take a literal act of war to get a datacenter off the network permanently. And even then, when local data and connectivity are lost, people running Web services for real should be backing their data up offsite and designing their services to easily spin up elsewhere. Some services hosted in those datacenters simply had a brief outage while other resources were provisioned.

    "The Cloud" is really just a series of Best Practices for software design and operations so that these services can run anywhere. Of course, they have to run somewhere, but they can run anywhere....

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    It's not a metaphor. It's a completely abused technical term. Network engineer use a cloud symbol for servers not on prem and say that those servers are "in the cloud". Then marketing overheard that the rest is history.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment